caa a22 4500 38805042X CHVBK 20180307125052.0 cr unu---uuuuu 161130s1998 xx s 000 0 eng 10.1017/S1528887000001178 doi S1528887000001178 pii (NATIONALLICENCE)cambridge-10.1017/S1528887000001178 McLeod-Kilmurray Heather Stichting Greenpeace and Environmental Public Interest Standing before the Community Judicature: Some lessons from the Federal Court of Canada [Elektronische Daten] [Heather McLeod-Kilmurray] On April 2,1998, three years after the ruling of the Court of First Instance, the European Court of Justice issued its appeal decision in the Stichting Greenpeace case. The Court of First Instance had denied locus standi under Article 230(4) (Article 173(4)) of the EC Treaty to Greenpeace, two local environmental groups and a series of individual applicants to challenge the decision of the European Commission to continue providing Community structural funds under the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) to Spain to build two power stations in the Canary Islands. Copyright © Centre for European Legal Studies, Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge 1998 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies Cambridge University Press 1(1998), 269-306 1528-8870 1<269 1998 1 CEL https://doi.org/10.1017/S1528887000001178 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1528887000001178 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- McLeod-Kilmurray Heather NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies Cambridge University Press 1(1998), 269-306 1528-8870 1<269 1998 1 CEL CC0 http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-cambridge