caa a22 4500 38807406X CHVBK 20180307125156.0 cr unu---uuuuu 161130e199901 xx s 000 0 eng 10.1017/S0841820900002162 doi S0841820900002162 pii (NATIONALLICENCE)cambridge-10.1017/S0841820900002162 Langton Rae Pornography: A Liberal's Unfinished Business [Elektronische Daten] [Rae Langton] Old wars about pornography and censorship have new armies in radical feminists. So Ronald Dworkin once remarked, defending the new relevance of his now classic liberal defense of free speech in his essay, ‘Do We Have a Right to Pornography?' Dworkin was right about the new battles, but wrong about his argument, which on the new battle ground not only failed to justify the permissive conclusion he desired, but helped to justify the prohibitive conclusion he despised. Pornography's traditional foes said pornography is immoral. Feminists said pornography is ‘the graphic, sexually explicit subordination of women through pictures or words'. Feminists said that pornography harms women, subordinates women, and silences women. In this context, Dworkin's old anti-moralist defense of pornography missed its mark. Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999 The Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence Cambridge University Press 12/1(1999-01), 109-133 0841-8209 12:1<109 1999 12 CJL https://doi.org/10.1017/S0841820900002162 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0841820900002162 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Langton Rae NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- The Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence Cambridge University Press 12/1(1999-01), 109-133 0841-8209 12:1<109 1999 12 CJL CC0 http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-cambridge