caa a22 4500 388107839 CHVBK 20180307125344.0 cr unu---uuuuu 161130e199912 xx s 000 0 eng 10.1017/S0008423900016966 doi S0008423900016966 pii (NATIONALLICENCE)cambridge-10.1017/S0008423900016966 Subramanian Narendra McGill University Ethnicity and Pluralism: An Exploration with Reference to Indian Cases [Elektronische Daten] [Narendra Subramanian] When might high ethnic mobilization co-exist with social pluralism? The article addresses this question by comparing four of India's major ethnic movements/parties. "Organizational pluralism” denotes flexibility and autonomy in party-society and intra-party transactions. Pluralism within influential political organizations aids social pluralism. High levels of organizational pluralism led Dravidianism to aid social pluralism; comparatively low levels led Hindu revivalist and Sikh organizations to ignore incentives to adopt more inclusive strategies. States willing and able to foster tolerance will emerge amidst high ethnic mobilization only if activists promote pluralism within major ethnic organizations. Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 1999 Canadian Journal of Political Science Cambridge University Press 32/4(1999-12), 715-744 0008-4239 32:4<715 1999 32 CJP https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423900016966 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423900016966 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Subramanian Narendra McGill University NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Canadian Journal of Political Science Cambridge University Press 32/4(1999-12), 715-744 0008-4239 32:4<715 1999 32 CJP CC0 http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-cambridge