caa a22 4500 388107871 CHVBK 20180307125344.0 cr unu---uuuuu 161130e199912 xx s 000 0 eng 10.1017/S0008423900016991 doi S0008423900016991 pii (NATIONALLICENCE)cambridge-10.1017/S0008423900016991 Howlett Michael Simon Fraser University Rejoinder to Stuart Soroka, "Policy Agenda-Setting Theory Revisited: A Critique of Howlett on Downs, Baumgartner and Jones, and Kingdon” [Elektronische Daten] [Michael Howlett] I am pleased to respond to Stuart Soroka's set of criticisms of the concepts, methodology and conclusions of my research into Canadian federal agenda-setting. My two articles were not intended to be the last word on the subject, and I am glad to see that they have sparked some interest and, hopefully, some future additional research into the subject. That having been said, let me make several points with respect to the central issues raised in the discussion and the general arguments made about the role of empirical research in the policy sciences. Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 1999 Canadian Journal of Political Science Cambridge University Press 32/4(1999-12), 773-779 0008-4239 32:4<773 1999 32 CJP https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423900016991 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 review-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423900016991 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Howlett Michael Simon Fraser University NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Canadian Journal of Political Science Cambridge University Press 32/4(1999-12), 773-779 0008-4239 32:4<773 1999 32 CJP CC0 http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-cambridge