caa a22 4500 388110619 CHVBK 20180307125352.0 cr unu---uuuuu 161130e199907 xx s 000 0 eng 10.1017/S1380203800001379 doi S1380203800001379 pii (NATIONALLICENCE)cambridge-10.1017/S1380203800001379 Raemaekers Daan A response to Stilborg's plea for regional analysis [Elektronische Daten] [Daan Raemaekers] Stilborg's comment on my 1997 article singles out two related subjects. The first is of a methodological nature. He states that a comparison of two ‘objects' requires a third ‘object' as a point of reference. In the case of my comparison of the Swifterbant and Ertebølle cultures, this point of reference is provided by the neolithic cultures to the South. His second argument is that the Ertebølle culture is not an homogenous entity, but rather comprises a series of regional groups with distinct aspects, especially in material culture. In the following response, I will discuss these two subjects. Copyright © The Author(s) 1999 Archaeological Dialogues Cambridge University Press 6/1(1999-07), 52-54 1380-2038 6:1<52 1999 6 ARD https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203800001379 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203800001379 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Raemaekers Daan NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Archaeological Dialogues Cambridge University Press 6/1(1999-07), 52-54 1380-2038 6:1<52 1999 6 ARD CC0 http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-cambridge