Effect of Different Abutments and Connections in Deformation Crestal Bone

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Alfredo Mikail Melo Mesquita, Juliano H M Silva, Cintia Helena Cury Saraceni, Alberto N Kojima, Mutlu Özcan]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2016
Enthalten in:
Implant Dentistry, 25(3):328-334
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 390147974
LEADER cad a22 4500
001 390147974
005 20200501042436.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 161201e201606 xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.5167/uzh-128189  |2 doi 
024 7 0 |a 10.1097/ID.0000000000000419  |2 doi 
035 |a (ZORA)oai:www.zora.uzh.ch:128189 
084 |a 610  |2 ddc 
091 |a 27213528  |b pmid 
245 0 0 |a Effect of Different Abutments and Connections in Deformation Crestal Bone  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Alfredo Mikail Melo Mesquita, Juliano H M Silva, Cintia Helena Cury Saraceni, Alberto N Kojima, Mutlu Özcan] 
506 |a openAccess  |2 eu-repo 
520 3 |a STATEMENT OF PROBLEM The use of Morse taper connections is increasing, but little is known about the biomechanical use of abutments and their use in fixed prostheses. PURPOSE This study evaluated the transmission of load on the bone implant-supported dentures, varying the type of prosthetic connection and abutment. MATERIAL AND METHODS Using 4 polyurethane models, 3 implants were inserted into each block, establishing the following groups: (a) external hexagon and Micro-Unit abutments; (b) external hexagon and UCLA abutment; (c) Morse taper and Micro-Unit abutments; and (d) Morse taper and UCLA abutments. The prosthetic structures were cast, and in a universal testing machine, load was applied midway between the implants, with cantilever intervals of 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 mm. Data were analyzed by Mann-Whitney, Friedman, and Kruskal-Wallis tests (P < 0.05). RESULTS Regarding the prosthetic connection, there was no difference in the use of hexagonal or Morse taper, but the use of Micro-Unit abutment showed lower deformation values than UCLA for the 2 connections. CONCLUSIONS The use of intermediate abutments affects the distribution of masticatory loads: the greater the length of the cantilever, the greater the surface deformation of the bone around the distal implant. 
690 7 |a Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry  |2 zora 
700 1 |a Mesquita  |D Alfredo Mikail Melo  |e joint author 
700 1 |a Silva  |D Juliano H M.  |e joint author 
700 1 |a Saraceni  |D Cintia Helena Cury  |e joint author 
700 1 |a Kojima  |D Alberto N.  |e joint author 
700 1 |a Özcan  |D Mutlu  |e joint author 
773 0 |t Implant Dentistry  |g 25(3):328-334 
856 4 0 |u https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/128189/1/Superficial%20deformation%20in%20bone%20for%20prosthesis_acc.pdf  |q text/html  |z WWW-Backlink auf das Repository 
908 |D 1  |a Journal Article  |z PeerReviewed  |2 zora 
950 |B ZORA  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/128189/1/Superficial%20deformation%20in%20bone%20for%20prosthesis_acc.pdf  |q text/html  |z WWW-Backlink auf das Repository 
950 |B ZORA  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Mesquita  |D Alfredo Mikail Melo  |e joint author 
950 |B ZORA  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Silva  |D Juliano H M.  |e joint author 
950 |B ZORA  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Saraceni  |D Cintia Helena Cury  |e joint author 
950 |B ZORA  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Kojima  |D Alberto N.  |e joint author 
950 |B ZORA  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Özcan  |D Mutlu  |e joint author 
950 |B ZORA  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Implant Dentistry  |g 25(3):328-334 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
949 |B ZORA  |F ZORA  |b ZORA  |j Journal Article  |c openAccess