A Plea for Annual Lists of State-Papers and Annual Reviews of State-Papers, as being essential preliminaries to State-Paper Catalogues
| LEADER | caa a22 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 390217204 | ||
| 003 | CHVBK | ||
| 005 | 20180308103600.0 | ||
| 007 | cr unu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 161201s1892 xx s 000 0 eng | ||
| 024 | 7 | 0 | |a 10.1093/library/s1-4.1.175 |2 doi |
| 035 | |a (NATIONALLICENCE)oxford-10.1093/library/s1-4.1.175 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a CAMPBELL |D F. B. F. | |
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A Plea for Annual Lists of State-Papers and Annual Reviews of State-Papers, as being essential preliminaries to State-Paper Catalogues |h [Elektronische Daten] |c [F. B. F. CAMPBELL] |
| 520 | 3 | |a PREFATORY NOTES. (i.) As read, this paper originally included a general preface written with the view of emphasising the importance of making State-Papers more available for public use, and showing in a general manner that in no country had the treatment of State-Papers been anything but disappointing, if we compared the actual results with the standard of success which it is quite possible to attain to. I have decided, however, to omit this preface as being a branch of the subject which might more profitably form the subject matter of a separate paper.(ii.) I find, after further experience and investigations, that the whole subject of State-Paper Lists, Reviews, and Catalogues is even more dependent for success on attention to prior steps of work than I had originally realised. For this reason, the matter cannot be comprehensively or satisfactorily dealt with, without first enunciating more fully than I have already done (in my previous paper) the Theories appertaining to those earlier stages, viz., the Theory of Compilation, and the Theory of Publication. It will be seen; therefore, that I have commenced the whole subject backwards, beginning with the last stage instead of with the first. I do not regret this, however, as I believe that the subject may perhaps be made more readily intelligible in this manner than by the alternative method. Having then already dealt with the final stage (A State-Paper Catalogue), I shall now try and show cause for my advocacy of Annual Lists and Annual Reviews of State-Papers. | |
| 540 | |a © Oxford University Press | ||
| 690 | 7 | |a Articles |2 nationallicence | |
| 773 | 0 | |t The Library |d Oxford University Press |g s1-4/1(1892), 175-183 |x 0024-2160 |q s1-4:1<175 |1 1892 |2 s1-4 |o libraj | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1093/library/s1-4.1.175 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI |
| 908 | |D 1 |a research-article |2 jats | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 856 |E 40 |u https://doi.org/10.1093/library/s1-4.1.175 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 100 |E 1- |a CAMPBELL |D F. B. F. | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 773 |E 0- |t The Library |d Oxford University Press |g s1-4/1(1892), 175-183 |x 0024-2160 |q s1-4:1<175 |1 1892 |2 s1-4 |o libraj | ||
| 900 | 7 | |a Metadata rights reserved |b CC BY-NC-4.0 |u http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |2 nationallicence | |
| 898 | |a BK010053 |b XK010053 |c XK010000 | ||
| 949 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |F NATIONALLICENCE |b NL-oxford | ||