<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">397495250</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180308164519.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">161202e199511  xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1016/S1010-7940(05)80110-1</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)oxford-10.1016/S1010-7940(05)80110-1</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Residual cognitive dysfunctioning at 6 months following coronary artery bypass graft surgery</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Neuropsychological testing is a sensitive method for quantitativeassessment of cognitive dysfunctioning following cardiopulmonary bypass(CPB). However, the methodological problems associated with this method,such as learning effects due to repeated testing and the effects ofdistress on test performance, have often been underestimated. In thisstudy, these confounding effects were controlled for by including thespouses of patients, exposed to the same potential stress effectsassociated with the operation, as a nonsurgical control group. Theexperimental group consisted of 63 patients (40-75 years) undergoingelective coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. A battery ofstandardized neuropsychological tests was administered to both groups 2weeks preoperatively and 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months postoperatively.Statistical testing of inter-group differences in preoperative topostoperative changes in test performance revealed the following results:(1) For immediate memory and learning, in general test scores showed thesame time course for both groups. (2) For recent memory, patients' scoresshowed a significant deterioration at 1 month after CABG surgery comparedwith the scores of spouses. This effect had not completely disappeared at 6months postoperatively. (3) For attention and psychomotor speed as well asverbal fluency, patients' scores had deteriorated significantly at 1 weekafter surgery, with incomplete recovery at 6 months. These negativecognitive effects were not related to the patients' ages or CPB parameters(duration of CPB, aortic cross-clamp time, mean flow and arterial pressureduring CPB and aortic cross-clamping, and minimum nasopharyngealtemperature). No differences in self-ratings of mood over time were foundbetween the patients and spouses. The results indicate that, whenadequately controlling for the effects of learning and distress, somecognitive functions are still impaired at 6 months after CABG surgery.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">© Springer-Verlag</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Elsevier Science B.V.</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">9/11(1995-11), 636-643</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1010-7940</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">9:11&lt;636</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1995</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">9</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">ejcts</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-7940(05)80110-1</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">abstract</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-7940(05)80110-1</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Elsevier Science B.V</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">9/11(1995-11), 636-643</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1010-7940</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">9:11&lt;636</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1995</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">9</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">ejcts</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">CC BY-NC-4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-oxford</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
