caa a22 4500 397498675 CHVBK 20180308164527.0 cr unu---uuuuu 161202e199503 xx s 000 0 eng 10.1093/fampra/12.1.28 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)oxford-10.1093/fampra/12.1.28 A pilot study of a computerized assessment (AGE-PC) for the elderly in general practice [Elektronische Daten] [A Hoskins, P A Saunders, J M Forrest] A pilot project was undertaken in Liverpool UK, to investigate whether data useful for both general practice and public health purposes could be collected by primary care personnel using a computerized semi-structured interview (AGE-PC) for assessment of patients aged 75 and over. A high degree of variation between practices was found in the proportion of elderly assessed with AGE-PC largely related to motivation to undertake assessments and methods employed to approach patients. Considerable differences between and within practices were evident in staff attitudes to the need for detailed formal assessments and the use of computers. Several aspects of the AGE-PC package itself were identified as requiring modification including streamlining data transfer methods, adding facilities for analysis and giving users a degree of choice over content of the assessment. This technique does offer a potentially efficient means of collecting very detailed standardized data for intra- or inter-practice analysis while at the same time generating a comprehensive report for individual patients. However, in the context of the over-75 assessments it was too time-consuming. Possible future strategies are discussed such as using an initial screening stage with a self-report questionnaire to reduce numbers needing full assessment and the use of the package for the community care assessments. The pilot project highlighted some of the potential advantages and disadvantages of collecting data from primary health care for public health purposes. One of the most salient lessons learnt was the importance of involving the different team members in the planning process so that there is agreement on: the essential data items required by both parties, the use of a uniform method of approaching and sampling patients for assessments, the importance of accuracy and obtaining a high response rate, and finally that the whole procedure must be easy and not involve too much time or effort on the part of the overloaded primary care staff. © Oxford University Press Original articles nationallicence Hoskins A. Liverpool Health Authority, Liverpool, UK, Liverpool, UK aut Saunders P A. Liverpool University Liverpool, UK aut Forrest J M. Liverpool Health Authority, Liverpool, UK, Liverpool, UK aut Family Practice Oxford University Press 12/1(1995-03), 28-31 0263-2136 12:1<28 1995 12 famprj https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/12.1.28 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/12.1.28 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Hoskins A. Liverpool Health Authority, Liverpool, UK, Liverpool, UK aut NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Saunders P A. Liverpool University Liverpool, UK aut NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Forrest J M. Liverpool Health Authority, Liverpool, UK, Liverpool, UK aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Family Practice Oxford University Press 12/1(1995-03), 28-31 0263-2136 12:1<28 1995 12 famprj Metadata rights reserved CC BY-NC-4.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-oxford