<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">397500580</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180308164531.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">161202e199502  xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1093/spp/22.1.39</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)oxford-10.1093/spp/22.1.39</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Pownall</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Ian</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Division of International Relations, Politics and Public Administration, School of Social Sciences, Staffordshire University, College Road, Stoke on Trent, ST4 2DE, UK</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4">
   <subfield code="a">The capture of internalisation as a policy tool: the case of ESPRIT</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Ian Pownall]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Internalisation is a transactional approach to the study of the multinational enterprise (MNE) and market behaviour, which has been widely applied to MNE development, decision-making criteria and R&amp;D considerations, but not to joint public-private funding of research. The political implications of internalisation are explored by examining the European Union programme ESPRIT. Through consideration of the market and technological factors associated with a firm's pursuit of internalisation as a viable business strategy and their role within the ESPRIT initiative, the argument is presented that European policy-makers exploited the failings of the European information technology sector to initiate the transfer of competence from the national to European arena. This has arguably led to the political ‘capture' of internalisation as a policy tool and a distortion of corporate strategy.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">© Beech Tree Publishing 1995</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Science and Public Policy</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Beech Tree Publishing</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">22/1(1995-02), 39-49</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0302-3427</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">22:1&lt;39</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1995</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">22</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">spp</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/22.1.39</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/22.1.39</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Pownall</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Ian</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Division of International Relations, Politics and Public Administration, School of Social Sciences, Staffordshire University, College Road, Stoke on Trent, ST4 2DE, UK</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Science and Public Policy</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Beech Tree Publishing</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">22/1(1995-02), 39-49</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0302-3427</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">22:1&lt;39</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1995</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">22</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">spp</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">CC BY-NC-4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="986" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">SWISSBIB</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">342927957</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-oxford</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
