caa a22 4500 397500793 CHVBK 20180308164532.0 cr unu---uuuuu 161202e199506 xx s 000 0 eng 10.1093/spp/22.3.147 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)oxford-10.1093/spp/22.3.147 Renn Ortwin Centre of Technology Assessment, Baden-Württemberg, Industries-traße 5, 70565 Stuttgart, Germany Style of using scientific expertise: A comparative framework [Elektronische Daten] [Ortwin Renn] Scientific expertise is necessary in the policy arena to replace the previous trial-and-error regime. It can offer enlightenment, instrumental or pragmatic knowledge, reflection, and catalytic process promotion. Four styles of using scientific expertise can be distinguished: adversarial, fiduciary, consensual and corporatist. A new mediative style results from the current, more open procedures in decision-making. Europe's strength in using scientific expertise depends on a more ‘system- and problem- oriented' approach in which science, politics and economics are linked by strategic networks. © Beech Tree Publishing 1995 Science and Public Policy Beech Tree Publishing 22/3(1995-06), 147-156 0302-3427 22:3<147 1995 22 spp https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/22.3.147 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/22.3.147 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Renn Ortwin Centre of Technology Assessment, Baden-Württemberg, Industries-traße 5, 70565 Stuttgart, Germany NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Science and Public Policy Beech Tree Publishing 22/3(1995-06), 147-156 0302-3427 22:3<147 1995 22 spp Metadata rights reserved CC BY-NC-4.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-oxford