caa a22 4500 397500947 CHVBK 20180308164532.0 cr unu---uuuuu 161202e199506 xx s 000 0 eng 10.1093/spp/22.3.175 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)oxford-10.1093/spp/22.3.175 Roqueplo Philippe CNRS, France Scientific expertise among political powers, administrations and public opinion [Elektronische Daten] [Philippe Roqueplo] Expert scientific appraisal is either confidential to the government commissioning it, or open to public debate. At the executive level of the European Community, intergovernmental negotiations substitute for the electorate. This renders expert appraisal incapable of becoming truly public. To overcome this, the conditions under which scientific interventions are implemented must be institutionalised. Time is indispensable if scientists/experts are to make sound judgements regarding complex phenomena: thus ‘emergency' should be banned. © Beech Tree Publishing 1995 Science and Public Policy Beech Tree Publishing 22/3(1995-06), 175-182 0302-3427 22:3<175 1995 22 spp https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/22.3.175 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/22.3.175 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Roqueplo Philippe CNRS, France NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Science and Public Policy Beech Tree Publishing 22/3(1995-06), 175-182 0302-3427 22:3<175 1995 22 spp Metadata rights reserved CC BY-NC-4.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-oxford