<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">397501935</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180308164534.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">161202e19950101xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a082578</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">0144-8420</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">pii</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)oxford-10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a082578</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Warren Forward</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">H.M.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Patient Dosimetry During Chest Radiography</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[H.M. Warren Forward]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Reasons for the variation in patient doses from diagnostic radiography procedures were investigated by assessing skin doses obtained from patients undergoing chest examinations. Data was collected from 54 tubes, involving over 1200 patients undergoing PA chest examinations. The 75th percentile value was 0.18 mGy compared to 0.26 mGy previously measured by the National Radiological Protection Board in a UK national survey. The applied potential is the main contributor to patient skin dose variation. If all departments were to use at least 90 kVP, the mean skin dose will be reduced by 30%, the maximum reduction for a tube currently using 54 kVP would be 61%. Only 31% of hospitals were using film-screen combinations with speeds of 400. Dose and cost savings can be achieved by increasing the frequency with which the correct exposure settings are selected at the first attempt, thus reducing the repeat rate. This, together with modification to departmental procedure on the correct approach in assessing exposure factors in respect to patient size, will lead to a reduction in the total effective dose of approximately 11%.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Radiation Protection Dosimetry</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Radiation Protection Dosimetry</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">57/1-4(1995-01-01), 441-444</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0144-8420</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">57:1-4&lt;441</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1995</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">57</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">rpd</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a082578</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a082578</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Warren Forward</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">H.M.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Radiation Protection Dosimetry</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">57/1-4(1995-01-01), 441-444</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0144-8420</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">57:1-4&lt;441</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1995</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">57</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">rpd</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">CC BY-NC-4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-oxford</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
