<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">39750280X</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180308164536.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">161202e19950101xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a082492</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">0144-8420</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">pii</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)oxford-10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a082492</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Oestmann (INVITED)</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">J.W.</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">INVITED</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4">
   <subfield code="a">The Scientific Work-Up of Radiographic Image Quality Now and a Decade Ago: The Radiologist's Approach</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[J.W. Oestmann (INVITED)]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">The past decade has seen a number of efforts to increase image quality and decrease examination hazards to the patient in medical imaging. A comparison of image quality studies in the early 1980s with those of the early 1990s shows that the amount of scientific publications on the topic as well as their sophistication has grown. The concept of diagnostically relevant structures as well as the observer performance test with receiver operator characteristics analysis has been well received. On the basis of our own experience in projection radiography a three-step approach to the evaluation or optimisation of new imaging modalities is proposed: (1) base evaluation applying adequate physical parameters; (2) subjective optimisation of the system with the diagnostic objectives in mind (i.e. the diagnostically relevant structures in radiographic studies) to generate a set of alternative hypotheses; and (3) comparison of these hypotheses with clinically oriented observed performance tests.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Radiation Protection Dosimetry</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Radiation Protection Dosimetry</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">57/1-4(1995-01-01), 9-11</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0144-8420</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">57:1-4&lt;9</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1995</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">57</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">rpd</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a082492</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a082492</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Oestmann (INVITED)</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">J.W.</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">INVITED</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Radiation Protection Dosimetry</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">57/1-4(1995-01-01), 9-11</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0144-8420</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">57:1-4&lt;9</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1995</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">57</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">rpd</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">CC BY-NC-4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-oxford</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
