<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">397516576</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180308164620.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">161202s1995    xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1093/eurpub/5.2.130</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)oxford-10.1093/eurpub/5.2.130</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Implications for the funding of the service costs of research and evaluation in the new British NHS</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[CHRISTINE MCDERMOTT, ROGER BEECH]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">The NHS reforms and creation of the UK internal market have led to changes in funding arrangements and incentives. Similar health care reforms are occurring across many developed countries, though at differing rates. These reforms have potentially serious implications for research funding and in particular, the service costs of health services research. Within the new NHS framework, the incentive to fund the service costs does not automatically fall on any agency and the main mechanism which should cover ‘excess' service costs, the Service Increment For Teaching and Research (SIFTR), is in its present form inadequate, being unresponsive and non-comprehensive. This can and has led to partially funded research projects, an outcome which is not sustainable in the longer term. This paper discusses the emerging problem and argues that a dearer definition of research costs is required, so that both service and research costs are considered synonymously with the whole cost of the research to funders being identified and agreed at the outset. The service costs of research must most importantly now be considered to be an integral part of the research budget. This will help ensure that projects are adequately funded and can be carried out efficiently to promote high quality, cost-effective care in the NHS. An NHS Research &amp; Development (R&amp;D) Consultative Taskforce was set up to review the present situation and make recommendations for the way forward. We hope that our elucidation of the problem and our recommendations, aid or strengthen those of the Taskforce in this current debate.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">© European Journal of Public Health</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">ORIGINAL ARTICLES ON OTHER TOPICS</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">NHS reforms</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">health services research</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">service costs</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">SIFTR</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">MRC Concordat</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">MCDERMOTT</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">CHRISTINE</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Health Economics Research Group, Bunel University Uxbridge, UK</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BEECH</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">ROGER</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Public Health Medicine, United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St Thomas's Hospitals St Thomas's Campus, London, UK</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">The European Journal of Public Health</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">5/2(1995), 130-135</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1101-1262</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">5:2&lt;130</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1995</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">5</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">eurpub</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/5.2.130</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/5.2.130</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">MCDERMOTT</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">CHRISTINE</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Health Economics Research Group, Bunel University Uxbridge, UK</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">BEECH</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">ROGER</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Public Health Medicine, United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St Thomas's Hospitals St Thomas's Campus, London, UK</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">The European Journal of Public Health</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">5/2(1995), 130-135</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1101-1262</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">5:2&lt;130</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1995</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">5</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">eurpub</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">CC BY-NC-4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-oxford</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
