<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">39752210X</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180308164635.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">161202e199501  xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1093/jxb/46.1.111</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)oxford-10.1093/jxb/46.1.111</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Relative water content and water potential of tissue 1</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[J.C. Diaz-Pérez, K.A. Shackel, E.G. Sutter]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Relative water content (RWC) and water potential as measured with the pressure chamber were evaluated as indicators of water status of tissue-cultured apple shoots and plantlets (shoots with roots). During the hydration required for RWC measurement, both water content and water potential exhibited the same hydration kinetics, indicating that 10 h were required for full hydration. Once full hydration was reached, shoot mass remained relatively constant. Moisture release characteristics were also constructed and the associated shoot and plantlet water relations parameters were estimated. Underin vitroconditions, both shoot and plantlet water potential were similar to the water potential of the culture medium in which they were grown. The moisture release characteristic of shoots and plantlets was consistent with that expected for typical plant tissues, and gave estimates of maximum modulus of elasticity (6.20±1.14 MPa), osmotic potential at saturation (−0.85 ± 0.10 MPa), osmotic potential at zero turgor (−1.16 ± 0.14 MPa) and RWC at zero turgor (78 ±2%) which were similar to values in the literature. Higher values of leaf conductance and RWC were found in shoots and plantlets placed at 95% RH (21 °C) compared to those at 90% RH. Plantlets had higher values of both conductance and RWC compared to shoots, suggesting thatin vitroroots are functional in water uptake. Relative water content was related to measures of physiological activity such as leaf conductance, and it was also easier to measure than water potential. Relative water content is suggested as a sound index of water status in tissue culture plants.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">© Oxford University Press</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Research Papers</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Conductance</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">microculture</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">water status</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">water stress</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Diaz-Pérez</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">J.C.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Pomology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Shackel</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">K.A.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Pomology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Sutter</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">E.G.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Pomology, University of California Davis, CA 95616, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Experimental Botany</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">46/1(1995-01), 111-118</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0022-0957</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">46:1&lt;111</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1995</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">46</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">exbotj</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/46.1.111</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/46.1.111</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Diaz-Pérez</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">J.C.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Pomology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Shackel</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">K.A.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Pomology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Sutter</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">E.G.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Pomology, University of California Davis, CA 95616, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Experimental Botany</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">46/1(1995-01), 111-118</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0022-0957</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">46:1&lt;111</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1995</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">46</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">exbotj</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">CC BY-NC-4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-oxford</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
