<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">397524064</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180308164640.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">161202e199501  xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037238</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)oxford-10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037238</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Heimann</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">C.F. Larry</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Michigan State University</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Different Paths to Success: A Theory of Organizational Decision Making and Administrative Reliability</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[C.F. Larry Heimann]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Discussions on organizational reliability have concentrated largely on structural means by which an agency can improve its performance. Agencies have two options, however, in achieving reliability objectives. An agency either may employ fewer but more reliable components in its administrative system, or it may choose to utilize less reliable components, counting on structural redundancy to increase the agency's overall reliability. The key question is when to choose one of these strategies for achieving organizational reliability rather than the other. In this article, I develop a theory explaining why agencies may choose to pursue organizational reliability using different strategies; the theory relies on Herbert Simon's distinction between programmed and nonprogrammed decision making. This theory is tested through a comparison of two case studies: NASA's pursuit of reliability in the area of manned space flight, and the drug testing process of the FDA.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">© 1995 by The Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Inc.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">ARTICLES</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">5/1(1995-01), 45-72</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1053-1858</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">5:1&lt;45</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1995</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">5</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">jopart</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037238</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037238</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Heimann</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">C.F. Larry</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Michigan State University</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">5/1(1995-01), 45-72</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1053-1858</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">5:1&lt;45</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1995</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">5</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">jopart</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">CC BY-NC-4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-oxford</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
