<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">397524242</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180308164640.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">161202e199501  xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037240</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)oxford-10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037240</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Robertson</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Peter J.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">University of Southern California</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Involvement in Boundary-Spanning Activity: Mitigating the Relationship between Work Setting and Behavior</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Peter J. Robertson]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">While behavior is influenced to a large extent by the situation in which it occurs, it is argued that consequences of engaging in boundary-spanning activity are likely to diminish the impact of the internal work setting on boundary spanners' work behavior. To assess this premise, four hypotheses are proposed regarding the mitigating effects of boundary-spanning activity on the relationship between three work setting features and a set of behaviors. Findings indicate that this relationship is weaker among spanners than among other organizational members for one of the three work-setting variables. In addition, the mitigating effects increase as the amount of boundary activity increases. These results appear limited to in-person boundary activity, as opposed to boundary interactions over the phone, and the location of the boundary activity does not appear to be a relevant factor. Implications for managers and for scholars are discussed.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">© 1995 by The Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Inc.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">ARTICLES</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">5/1(1995-01), 73-98</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1053-1858</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">5:1&lt;73</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1995</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">5</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">jopart</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037240</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037240</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Robertson</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Peter J.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">University of Southern California</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">5/1(1995-01), 73-98</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1053-1858</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">5:1&lt;73</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1995</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">5</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">jopart</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">CC BY-NC-4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-oxford</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
