<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">397524285</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180308164640.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">161202e199510  xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037258</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)oxford-10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037258</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Institutions Matter: Comparing Deficit Spending in the United States and Japan</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Sung Deuk Hahm, Mark S. Kamlet, David C. Mowery]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">This article analyzes the post-World War II deficit experiences of the United States and Japan. Four potential explanations of the size of the central government deficit in these two countries are examined: the influence of the economy; the influence of the party in power; Roubini and Sachs's (1989a and 1989b) strength-of-government hypothesis; and the irresponsible Congress/responsible president hypothesis (relevant only to the United States). As expected, we find that in both countries the state of the economy has an important influence on the deficit. Controlling for the economy, we find stronger support for the strength-of-government hypothesis for Japan than Roubini and Sachs found. In the United States, however, we find no support for the party-in-power, the strength-of-government, or the irresponsible Congress/responsible president hypotheses. Indeed, these latter two hypotheses are contradicted by evidence that when the president has strong political and popular support, as measured by his control of Congress and the state of the economy, the U.S. deficit appears to increase by more than would otherwise be the case. The contrasting empirical results for the United States and Japan reflect the distinctive structural and institutional features of the U.S. presidential and Japanese parliamentary systems, the impact of these features on the incentives of the relevant political actors, and the influence of these incentives on the policy outcomes.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">© 1995 by The Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Inc.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">ARTICLES</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Hahm</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Sung Deuk</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Georgetown University</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Kamlet</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Mark S.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Carnegie-Mellon University</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Mowery</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">David C.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">University of California Berkeley</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">5/4(1995-10), 429-450</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1053-1858</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">5:4&lt;429</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1995</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">5</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">jopart</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037258</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037258</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Hahm</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Sung Deuk</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Georgetown University</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Kamlet</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Mark S.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Carnegie-Mellon University</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Mowery</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">David C.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">University of California Berkeley</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">5/4(1995-10), 429-450</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1053-1858</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">5:4&lt;429</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1995</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">5</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">jopart</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">CC BY-NC-4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-oxford</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
