caa a22 4500 397524307 CHVBK 20180308164640.0 cr unu---uuuuu 161202e199501 xx s 000 0 eng 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037239 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)oxford-10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037239 Maynard-Moody Steven University of Kansas Managing Controversies over Science: The Case of Fetal Research [Elektronische Daten] [Steven Maynard-Moody] A portrait of Ben Franklin painted in Paris during the American Revolution carries the inscription "He wrested the lightning from the sky and the scepter from the Tyrants” (Piel 1979, 41). From the time of its founding our nation has valued science as both a source of knowledge and a guarantor of political freedom. Science, in this view, is inherently progressive and must not be contaminated by ideology and political passions (Proctor 1991, 4). But increasingly science is caught in ideological and political disputes. This article discusses the implications of science controversies for managing science policy and examines the twenty-year fetal research dispute. © 1995 by The Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Inc. ARTICLES nationallicence Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory Oxford University Press 5/1(1995-01), 5-18 1053-1858 5:1<5 1995 5 jopart https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037239 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037239 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Maynard-Moody Steven University of Kansas NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory Oxford University Press 5/1(1995-01), 5-18 1053-1858 5:1<5 1995 5 jopart Metadata rights reserved CC BY-NC-4.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-oxford