<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">397524323</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180308164641.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">161202e19950201xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.2307/3097005</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)oxford-10.2307/3097005</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Figert</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Anne E.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Loyola University Chicago</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4">
   <subfield code="a">The Three Faces of PMS: The Professional, Gendered, and Scientific Structuring of a Psychiatric Disorder</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Anne E. Figert]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">The case examined here concerns the 1986 decision by the Board of Trustees of the American Psychiatric Association (APA) to include Late Luteal Phase Dysphoric Disorder (LLPDD)—a PMS-related diagnosis—in its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition, Revised (DSM-111-R). Drawing on a social worlds perspective in the sociology of science, I argue that this controversy was not restricted to conflict between feminists and the APA as was portrayed in the popular press; nor, was it a natural result of scientific progress set within rational procedures of the revision process within the APA. Rather, I argue that as a result of sustained debate and conflict, the diagnosis of LLPDD assumed different forms and even became a different artifact: I) In the &quot;health and mental health domain,” LLPDD became the object of struggle for professional control over mental disorders among the various scientific, medical, and mental health fields; 2) in the &quot;woman domain,” LLPDD was defined as a result of struggle for control over the definition of a normal and healthy woman; 3) in the &quot;science domain,” LLPDD was a site in which the definition of the &quot;truth” about PMS was debated publicly and the knowledge used in settling social and policy issues in powerful organizations like the APA.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">© 1995 Society for the Study of Social Problems, Inc.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Medical Practices</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Social Problems</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">42/1(1995-02-01), 56-73</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0037-7791</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">42:1&lt;56</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1995</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">42</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">socpro</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.2307/3097005</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.2307/3097005</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Figert</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Anne E.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Loyola University Chicago</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Social Problems</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">42/1(1995-02-01), 56-73</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0037-7791</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">42:1&lt;56</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1995</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">42</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">socpro</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">CC BY-NC-4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-oxford</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
