<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">397547749</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180308164743.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">161202e199603  xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1093/heapro/11.1.55</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)oxford-10.1093/heapro/11.1.55</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">ØVRETVIET</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">JOHN</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">The Nordic School of Public Health, Goteborg, Sweden</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Quality in health promotion</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[JOHN ØVRETVIET]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Less health finance and the competitive contract culture are leading many health services to adopt quality methods to prove and improve their quality. Health promotion programmes face similar changes, but have not made great use of modern quality management methods. In part this has been because the definitions and approaches to quality have not appeared to be relevant to health promotion. Practitioners need to consider which methods and approaches are most suited to their programmes. This paper shows that many quality ideas and methods are congruent with good practice in health promotion, and may help to implement such practices more widely as well as to develop theory and practice. There is a danger that inappropriate ways of defining, specifying and assuring quality will be imposed on programmes. Practitioners need to consider which methods and approaches are most suited to their programmes. This paper seeks to stimulate debate about the need to prove and improve quality in health promotion, and about how best to do so. It considers definitions of quality, measurement, competing quality paradigms, quality in contracting and concepts of process and system in the context of health promotion programmes.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">© Oxford University Press</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Debate</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">contracts</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">health promotion</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">purchasing</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">quality</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Health Promotion International</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">11/1(1996-03), 55-62</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0957-4824</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">11:1&lt;55</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1996</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">11</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">heapro</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/11.1.55</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">other</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/11.1.55</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">ØVRETVIET</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">JOHN</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">The Nordic School of Public Health, Goteborg, Sweden</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Health Promotion International</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">11/1(1996-03), 55-62</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0957-4824</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">11:1&lt;55</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1996</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">11</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">heapro</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">CC BY-NC-4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-oxford</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
