<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">397551703</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180308164752.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">161202e199603  xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1093/litthe/10.1.1</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)oxford-10.1093/litthe/10.1.1</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">PRESENCE OF GOD? TOWARDS THE POSSIBILITY OF A THEOLOGICAL AESTHETIC IN AN ANALYSIS OF GEORGE STEINER</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Karl-Josef Kuschel, Andrew Hass: translator]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">This article is a critical examination of George Steiner's book Real Presences (1989). This book is, for a literary critic, a bold and provocative attempt to describe anew the experience of language and art as an experience of transcendence. To Steiner, every seriously taken work of art is an opus metaphysicum. The article shows that Steiner's venture implies a sharp criticism of a literary approach which has cut out completely the religious dimension from its methodological discourse. The article also contains a criticism of a theology (Karl Barth and the consequences of his thought) which continually views the artistic and the aesthetic with a mistrust and stands over against them with a rejection justified on the grounds of revelation theology. The critical theological query against Steiner's book consists in the demand to describe more precisely the concept of transcendence. Steiner's approach runs the risk of taking over every great work of art for a &quot;religious” experience of transcendence, and ignores too much the role of the recipient for whom a work of art can bring about different experiences. Only an unambiguous definition of what transcendence is can make a work of art into a medium of a transcendence-experience. In exact theological terms, a work of art is the place of probability, of seeming truth [Wahr-Scheinliches], in the double sense of the word.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">© Oxford University Press</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Articles</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Kuschel</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Karl-Josef</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">University of Tubingen, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Hass</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Andrew</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">University of Tubingen, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">trl</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Literature and Theology</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">10/1(1996-03), 1-19</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0269-1205</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">10:1&lt;1</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1996</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">10</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">litthe</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/litthe/10.1.1</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/litthe/10.1.1</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Kuschel</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Karl-Josef</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">University of Tubingen, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Hass</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Andrew</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">University of Tubingen, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">trl</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Literature and Theology</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">10/1(1996-03), 1-19</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0269-1205</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">10:1&lt;1</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1996</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">10</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">litthe</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">CC BY-NC-4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-oxford</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
