<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">39756760X</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180308164832.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">161202e199602  xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.3382/ps.0750203</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)oxford-10.3382/ps.0750203</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Differential Antibody Responses in 6.B Major Histocompatibility (B) Complex Congenic Chickens</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[MICHAEL C. DIX, ROBERT L. TAYLOR]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Lines 6.6-2 (B 2 B 2) and 6.15-5 (B 2 B 2), congenic for the major histocompatibility (B) complex with &gt; 99.9% background gene uniformity, were used to examine primary antibody responses to two antigens. In each of two trials, 1 mL of 5% SRBC, a T cell-dependent antigen, or 0.1 mL of Brucella abortus (BA), a T cell-independent antigen, was injected into separate groups of each B genotype aged 3 and 6 wk. Blood samples were taken from the chickens 7 d after immunization. Serum titers (log2) for both total antibody and mercaptoethanol (ME)-sensitive antibody to detect IgG were assayed by microtiter procedures. Least squares analysis of variance and Fisher's protected Least Significant Difference at P &lt; 0.05 were used to evaluate the data. The total anti-SRBC antibody titer was significantly higher in B 5 B 5 chicks than in B 2 B 2 chicks at 4 and 7 w k of age. There was no significant difference in ME-sensitive antibody to SRBC. Chicks of the B 5 B 5 genotype also had significantly higher total and IgG antibody titers to BA at both ages than B 2 B 2 chicks. The results indicate that 4- and 7-wk-old B 5 B 5 chicks had a significantly stronger antibody response to SRBC or BA than B 2 B 2 chicks.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">© 1996 Poultry Science Association, Inc.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Immunology</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">B complex</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">sheep red blood cells</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Brucella abortus</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">DIX</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">MICHAEL C.</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">TAYLOR</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">ROBERT L.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">2To whom correspondence should be addressed.</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Poultry Science</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">75/2(1996-02), 203-207</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0032-5791</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">75:2&lt;203</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1996</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">75</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">ps</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0750203</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0750203</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">DIX</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">MICHAEL C.</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">TAYLOR</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">ROBERT L.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">2To whom correspondence should be addressed</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Poultry Science</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">75/2(1996-02), 203-207</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0032-5791</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">75:2&lt;203</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1996</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">75</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">ps</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">CC BY-NC-4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-oxford</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
