<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">397569114</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180308164836.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">161202e199601  xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.3382/ps.0750069</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)oxford-10.3382/ps.0750069</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Phosphorus Equivalence of Microbial Phytase in Turkey Diets as Influenced by Calcium to Phosphorus Ratios and Phosphorus Levels</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[H. QIAN, E. T. KORNEGAY, D. M. DENBOW]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Male day-old turkey poults (n = 768) were fed 0, 300, 600, or 900 U of phytase/kg of a corn-soybean diet in combination with four Ca:total P (tP) ratios of 1.1, 1.4, 1.7, and 2.0:1, and two levels of nonphytate P (nP) of 0.27 and 0.36% in a 21-d trial. Dietary Ca:tP ratios were obtained by varying defluorinated phosphate and limestone at the expense of cornstarch. The calculated dietary percentage of phytate P was 0.266 for all diets. Phytase additions linearly increased (P &lt; 0.05) BW gain, feed intake, gain:feed, toe ash content, and apparent retentions of Ca and P at each Ca:tP ratio and nP level, but the response was influenced by dietary Ca:tP ratios and P levels. The detrimental effect (P &lt; 0.02) of widening the Ca:tP ratio was observed for all measurements at each phytase and P level, and was greatest at lower phytase and P levels. Widening the Ca:tP ratio from 1.4 to 2.0 decreased the phytase efficacy by 7.4 and 4.9%, respectively, for 0.27 and 0.36% nP diets, which was close to the decrease in the phytase activity in vitro by 7.5 and 6.7%, respectively. The largest responses to supplemental phytase were achieved when poults were fed diets with 600 and 900 U of phytase/kg diet, respectively, for 0.36 and 0.27% nP, and for Ca:tP ratios ranging from 1.1 to 1.4:1. Second-order translog equations were generated for the phytase, Ca:tP ratio, and P effect, and nonlinear and linear equations for the phytase and Ca:tP ratio effect. Based on an assessment for the R2 and P values of equations, BW gain, feed intake, toe ash content, and P retention were sensitive measurements of the response to phytase addition. Equivalent equations were developed to determine the P equivalency of supplemental phytase. About 652 and 963 U of phytase were equivalent to 1 g nP, respectively, for 0.27 and 0.36% nP diets in turkey poults from hatch to 21 d of age.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">© 1996 Poultry Science Association, Inc.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metabolism and Nutrition</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">phytase</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">calcium</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">phosphorus</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">turkey</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">equivalent</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">QIAN</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">H.</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">KORNEGAY</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">E. T.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">1To whom correspondence should be addressed.</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">DENBOW</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">D. M.</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Poultry Science</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">75/1(1996-01), 69-81</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0032-5791</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">75:1&lt;69</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1996</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">75</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">ps</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0750069</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0750069</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">QIAN</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">H.</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">KORNEGAY</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">E. T.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">1To whom correspondence should be addressed</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">DENBOW</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">D. M.</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Poultry Science</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">75/1(1996-01), 69-81</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0032-5791</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">75:1&lt;69</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1996</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">75</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">ps</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">CC BY-NC-4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-oxford</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
