<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">397571550</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180308164843.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">161202e19961001xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1093/ee/25.5.1002</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)oxford-10.1093/ee/25.5.1002</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Natural Causes and Rates of Early Larval Mortality in Gypsy Moths (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) Sampled from Field Populations in Different Density States</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Ellen H. Yerger, Marycarol Rossiter]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">There was significant variation in early survival among gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.), populations across the northeastern United States. The test individuals were collected as new eggs from field populations representing 5 regions, which differed in their history of gypsy moth establishment. Within each region, 2 populations were sampled: one in the building phase and the other in the outbreak phase of the gypsy moth population density cycle. We measured hatch success and incidence of early death (up to day 12 after feeding initiation) and identified the cause of death (viral, fungal, or poor quality). These data were used to test the following 2 hypotheses: (1) young larvae from high density populations experience greater mortality because of disease and poor quality than those from building populations, and (2) early stage survival is greater at the leading edge of gypsy moth range expansion than in populations from established regions. We found that mortality patterns differed in relation to density of the sampled population: populations in the outbreak stage were of poorer quality, showing lower hatch success and higher mortality among hatchlings. Mortality caused by a nucleopolyhedrosis virus was greatest among neonates from outbreak populations relative to neighboring building populations in all regions where there was no history of Entomophaga maimaiga (Humber) fungal infection. Despite the presence of E. maimaiga infection in field populations of several regions before the egg laying period, there was no evidence of infection by the fungus E. maimaiga in neonates hatched from any field collected egg masses. In neonates who were collected as eggs from populations with a history of E. maimaiga infection, the virus was curiously absent, despite its characteristic presence in building and outbreak populations and usual role in ending an outbreak. These results suggest that it is important to determine whether this fungus interferes with replication and transmission of the virus and inadvertently prevents the initiation or development of a viral epizootic. Finally, regions with the longest history of gypsy moth establishment had lower overall early survival. However, this relationship may be confounded by the presence of the new fungal microbe, E. maimaiga, in the 2 regions of oldest establishment. In these 2 regions, 48% of the egg masses had very poor hatch compared with 9% for the other 3 regions. But, if only post-hatch survival is considered, there was no relationship between early stage mortality and time after gypsy moth establishment in a region.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">© 1996 Entomological Society of America</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Population Ecology</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Lymantria dispar</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Entomophaga maimaiga fungus</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">nucleopolyhedrosis virus</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">population quality</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">population dynamics</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">density dependence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Yerger</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Ellen H.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Entomology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Rossiter</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Marycarol</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Entomology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Environmental Entomology</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">25/5(1996-10-01), 1002-1011</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0046-225X</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">25:5&lt;1002</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1996</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">25</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">ee</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/25.5.1002</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/25.5.1002</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Yerger</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Ellen H.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Entomology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Rossiter</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Marycarol</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Entomology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Environmental Entomology</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">25/5(1996-10-01), 1002-1011</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0046-225X</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">25:5&lt;1002</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1996</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">25</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">ee</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">CC BY-NC-4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-oxford</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
