caa a22 4500 397572778 CHVBK 20180308164846.0 cr unu---uuuuu 161202e199601 xx s 000 0 eng 10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a013609 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)oxford-10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a013609 Morishima M. London School of Economics and Political Science Morishima on Ricardo: two replies [Elektronische Daten] [M. Morishima] Although Ricardo does not use the concept ‘general equilibrium', his model may be described in terms of several sectors forming a consistent system. We can find many similarities in formulations and conclusions between his and Walras' economics, despite the fact that historians of economic thought generally tend to reject such a portrait of Ricardo. This paper is mainly a response to Kurz-Salvadori's criticisms of Morishima's Ricardo, from Sraffa's point of view. None of the criticisms is accepted. The author also defends himself from Peach whom he takes to be representative of the historians' view of Ricardo. © 1996 Academic Press Limited Articles nationallicence Cambridge Journal of Economics Oxford University Press 20/1(1996-01), 91-109 0309-166X 20:1<91 1996 20 cameco https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a013609 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a013609 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Morishima M. London School of Economics and Political Science NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Cambridge Journal of Economics Oxford University Press 20/1(1996-01), 91-109 0309-166X 20:1<91 1996 20 cameco Metadata rights reserved CC BY-NC-4.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-oxford