<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">397572824</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180308164846.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">161202e199605  xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a013616</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)oxford-10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a013616</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Stabile</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">D. R.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">St Mary's College of Maryland</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Pigou, Clark and modern economics: the quality of the workforce</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[D. R. Stabile]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Pigou and Clark investigated the relationships between wages and the quality of the workforce with their common but distinctive concept of social costs. Pigou found cases in labour markets where improvements in workforce quality had external benefits that increased GNP. Clark saw the social costs of labour as the overhead costs society had to be pay to keep its workforce intact, and using a dynamic institutional theory, argued that those costs should be placed directly on business in terms of a guaranteed living wage. It is argued that modern economics has neglected any connection between wages and social costs by treating them separately and propounding a trade-off between equity and efficiency. As a result, they analyse cost cutting programmes in terms of their impact on competitiveness, and neglect how they can result in an inferior workforce.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">© 1996 Academic Press Limited</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Articles</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Cambridge Journal of Economics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">20/3(1996-05), 277-288</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0309-166X</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">20:3&lt;277</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1996</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">20</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">cameco</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a013616</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a013616</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Stabile</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">D. R.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">St Mary's College of Maryland</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Cambridge Journal of Economics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">20/3(1996-05), 277-288</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0309-166X</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">20:3&lt;277</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1996</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">20</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">cameco</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">CC BY-NC-4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-oxford</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
