<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">397577028</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180308164858.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">161202e199603  xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024459</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)oxford-10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024459</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Access to health care in England: continuing inequalities in the distribution of GPs</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Michaela Benzeval, Ken Judge]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Background One of the successes of the National Health Service is that the distribution of general practitioners(GPs) corresponds much more closely to the size of the local communities than it did before 1948. However, more should be done to reflect the fact that different populations have variable needs for GPs. The aim of this paper is to estimate the relative need for GPs by linking evidence from individual utilization data to the characteristics of small areas. Methods Statistical models of GP utilization were developed from household survey data on 12 729 adults representative of the English population. The odds ratios derived from the models were combined with Census information for Family Health Services Authorities (FHSAs) to calculate a need indicator, which was used to estimate the number of GPs ‘needed' in an area for comparison with the actual distribution. Results The utilization of GPs is associated with morbidity, demographic and socioeconomic variables. The needs indicator derived from the model of GP utilization varies from 1⋅66 to 2⋅40 with a mean of 2. Substantial changes in the distribution of GPs are required to reflect the relative need for them. For example, in relative terms, Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly has an excess of GPs of almost one-fifth whereas Rotherham has a shortfall of more than one-third. Conclusions The findings in this paper suggest that there are still considerable inequalities in access to GP services in England in relation to need.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">© Oxford University Press</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Articles</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">general practitioners</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">equity</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">access</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">utilization</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">need</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">weighted population</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">synthetic estimation</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Benzeval</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Michaela</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">King's Fund Policy Institute, 11-13 Cavendish Square, London WIM 0AN</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Judge</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Ken</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">King's Fund Policy Institute, 11-13 Cavendish Square, London WIM 0AN</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Public Health</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">18/1(1996-03), 33-40</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1741-3842</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">18:1&lt;33</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1996</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">18</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">pubmed</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024459</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024459</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Benzeval</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Michaela</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">King's Fund Policy Institute, 11-13 Cavendish Square, London WIM 0AN</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Judge</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Ken</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">King's Fund Policy Institute, 11-13 Cavendish Square, London WIM 0AN</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Public Health</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">18/1(1996-03), 33-40</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1741-3842</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">18:1&lt;33</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1996</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">18</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">pubmed</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">CC BY-NC-4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-oxford</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
