<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">397577036</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180308164858.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">161202e199603  xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024468</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)oxford-10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024468</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Promotion of cervical screening uptake by health visitor follow-up of women who repeatedly failed to attend</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Harry Campbell, Sheena MacDonald, Morna McKiernan]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Background It is important that if cervical screening programmes are to be successful coverage rates of the target population of women are high. In the context of a well-organized programme in Fife a project was carried out to assess the impact of health visitors following up women who had repeatedly failed to attend for screening. Methods Ten health visitors in Fife were randomly selected and were each asked to approach 20 women registered with the general practice to which they were attached who met the study criteria. Women were asked for their reasons for non-attendance. Subsequent attendance for cervical screening was identified through the on-line cervical cytology database. Results Two health visitors declined to participate in the project. One hundred and sixty-two women were offered a visit by a health visitor to discuss their reasons for nonattendance. Forty-two (28 per cent) of the women approached attended for a smear in the following three months. Of those visited by a health visitor 37 per cent attended for a smear. Conclusions In Fife, local beliefs and attitudes about cervical screening together with lack of knowledge of existing clinics with female staff operating outside working hours constitute the major reasons for non-attendance. In this situation, a personal approach based on providing information and individual counselling appears to be successful in encouraging non-attenders to reconsider their decision and participate in the cervical screening programme.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">© Oxford University Press</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Articles</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">health visiting</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">cervical cancer</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">cervical screening</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">disease prevention</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Campbell</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Harry</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Public Health Medicine, University of Edinburgh Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">MacDonald</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Sheena</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Fife Health Research Glenrothes House, North Street, Glenrothes KY7 5PB</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">McKiernan</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Morna</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Fife Healthcare NHS Trust Glenrothes House, North Street, Glenrothes KY7 5PB</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Public Health</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">18/1(1996-03), 94-97</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1741-3842</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">18:1&lt;94</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1996</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">18</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">pubmed</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024468</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024468</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Campbell</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Harry</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Public Health Medicine, University of Edinburgh Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">MacDonald</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Sheena</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Fife Health Research Glenrothes House, North Street, Glenrothes KY7 5PB</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">McKiernan</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Morna</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Fife Healthcare NHS Trust Glenrothes House, North Street, Glenrothes KY7 5PB</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Public Health</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">18/1(1996-03), 94-97</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1741-3842</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">18:1&lt;94</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1996</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">18</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">pubmed</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">CC BY-NC-4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-oxford</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
