<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">397577753</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180308164900.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">161202e199609  xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024511</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)oxford-10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024511</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Improving the coverage of neonatal BCG vaccination</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[David Chappel, Vasco Fernandes]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Background It is recommended that neonates at higher risk of contracting tuberculosis (such as in certain ethnic groups) should be vaccinated with BCG as soon as possible after birth. In Milton Keynes, during the late 1980s, there was anecdotal evidence to suggest that many higher-risk cases were not receiving BCG vaccination. The objectives of the study were to audit the neonatal BCG vaccination programme and to develop a system for improving and monitoring coverage. Method Two main sources of data were used: the obstetric computer, which gave the denominator of women considered to be in a higher-risk group, and the community child health computer, which gave the numerator of BCG vaccinations given. A case note audit was used to check the quality of these data. A computer-generated reminder was used to make sure that the antenatal assessment of risk was known about immediately after delivery. Results Estimated vaccine coverage rose from about 20 percent (1988-1990) to 78 percent by 1993. The audit suggested that about 8 per cent of vaccinations were not being recorded and 9 per cent were given unnecessarily. In addition, about 2 percent were picked up postnatally and 1 percent were missed completely Conclusion Improved coverage and adequate monitoring can be achieved using the two computerized systems. This method has applications to other conditions where antenatal assessment can predict risk for a neonate, such as Hepatitis B or sickle cell disease.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">© Oxford University Press</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Articles</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Chappel</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">David</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Public Health Medicine, Buckinghamshire Health Authority, Milton Keynes Hospital Campus, Milton Keynes MK6 5LD</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Fernandes</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Vasco</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Public Health Medicine, Buckinghamshire Health Authority, Milton Keynes Hospital Campus, Milton Keynes MK6 5LD</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Public Health</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">18/3(1996-09), 308-312</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1741-3842</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">18:3&lt;308</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1996</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">18</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">pubmed</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024511</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024511</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Chappel</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">David</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Public Health Medicine, Buckinghamshire Health Authority, Milton Keynes Hospital Campus, Milton Keynes MK6 5LD</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Fernandes</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Vasco</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Public Health Medicine, Buckinghamshire Health Authority, Milton Keynes Hospital Campus, Milton Keynes MK6 5LD</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Public Health</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">18/3(1996-09), 308-312</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1741-3842</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">18:3&lt;308</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1996</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">18</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">pubmed</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">CC BY-NC-4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-oxford</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
