<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">39758105X</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180308164907.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">161202e199610  xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1093/ijrl/8.4.532</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)oxford-10.1093/ijrl/8.4.532</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">LAWAND</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">KATHLEEN</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Of the Quebec Bar. LL.L., LL.B. (Ottawa), LL.M. (London). This article is a revised version of the éauthor's masters' thesis submitted to the London School of Economics in 1995. The author wishes to express her thanks to Professor Rosalyn Higgins for her helpful comments on earlier drafts, and to Michael Byers for much appreciated suggestions and encouragement. The views expressed are the author's own</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4">
   <subfield code="a">The Right to Return of Palestinians in International Law</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[KATHLEEN LAWAND]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">This article examines the question of whether Palestinian refugees and displaced persons can claim a right to return to either or both Israel and Palestine, assuming the existence of a Palestinian State in the territories of the West Bank and Gaza. After an historical overview, the author first interprets the right to enter one's country enshrined in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, with particular regard to the meaning of the term, ‘his own country'. Following an examination of the travaux préparatoires and of the concept of nationality in international law, it is argued that ‘his own country' refers not only to the country of de jure nationality, but also to the country with which the claimant has a ‘genuine linka' similar to that described in the Nottebohm case. The effect of the passage of time on the ‘genuine link' is then analyzed and a set of criteria applicable to claimants of the right to return generally is proposed. These criteria are then applied to potential Palestinian claimants. The second part of the article focuses on the effect of changes of sovereignty in the territories of what was Palestine on the de jure nationality of Palestinian refugees and displaced persons, and thus on their possible claim to return on the basis of nationality. On this basis, it is argued that if nationality follows State succession, then nationals of what was formerly Palestine could claim the right to return to Israel and/or Palestine, in view of their de jure nationality.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">© Oxford University Press</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">ARTICLES</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">International Journal of Refugee Law</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">8/4(1996-10), 532-568</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0953-8186</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">8:4&lt;532</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1996</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">8</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">reflaw</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/8.4.532</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/8.4.532</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">LAWAND</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">KATHLEEN</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Of the Quebec Bar. LL.L., LL.B. (Ottawa), LL.M. (London). This article is a revised version of the éauthor's masters' thesis submitted to the London School of Economics in 1995. The author wishes to express her thanks to Professor Rosalyn Higgins for her helpful comments on earlier drafts, and to Michael Byers for much appreciated suggestions and encouragement. The views expressed are the author's own</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">International Journal of Refugee Law</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">8/4(1996-10), 532-568</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0953-8186</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">8:4&lt;532</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1996</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">8</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">reflaw</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">CC BY-NC-4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="986" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">SWISSBIB</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">350587051</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-oxford</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
