<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">39759075X</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180308164937.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">161202e199605  xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1093/jac/37.suppl_A.135</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)oxford-10.1093/jac/37.suppl_A.135</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Comparative efficacy of sparfloxacin versus ciprofloxacin in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Kurt G. Naber, F. Di Silveriob, A. Geddes, J. Guibert]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">A total of 686 adult patients with complicated urinary tract infections were enrolled in a double-blind, randomised, multicentre study to compare sparfloxacin (200 mg loading dose on day 1 followed by 100 mg daily) with ciprofloxacin (500 mg orally twice daily) for 10 to 14 days. Urinary tract infection was defined as pyuria and bacteriuria (cfu ≥ 105/mL). Evaluations were performed at four time-points. The clinical efficacy of the two antibacterial agents was equivalent at the end of treatment: clinical cure in 88.6% of the intent-to-treat population and 87.3% in the evaluable population treated with sparfloxacin compared to 85.4% and 84.8% of the intent-to-treat and evaluable populations, respectively, treated with ciprofloxacin. The clinical results were also equivalent at follow-up. The bacteriological efficacy of the two agents was not equivalent. At the end of treatment, bacteriological cure was observed in 72.6% of the intent-to-treat and 72.1% of the evaluable populations treated with sparfloxacin and in 81.4% and 80.8% of the intent-to-treat and evaluable populations, respectively, treated with ciprofloxacin. The difference was primarily because of a higher number of persisting pathogens, which included Enterobacteriaceae other than Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and enterococci, which exhibited moderate susceptibility to sparfloxacin. Tolerability was similar in the two treatment groups.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">© 1996 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Articles</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Naber</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Kurt G.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Urologic Clinic, Elisabeth Hospital Straubing, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Di Silveriob</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">F.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Clinica Urologica, Universita Degli Studi Rome, Italy</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Geddes</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">A.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Infectious Diseases, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital Birmingham, UK</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Guibert</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">J.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Service de Microbiologie Medicale, Hospital Saint-Joseph Paris, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">37(1996-05), 135-144</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0305-7453</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">37&lt;135</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1996</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">37</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">jac</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/37.suppl_A.135</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/37.suppl_A.135</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Naber</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Kurt G.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Urologic Clinic, Elisabeth Hospital Straubing, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Di Silveriob</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">F.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Clinica Urologica, Universita Degli Studi Rome, Italy</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Geddes</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">A.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Infectious Diseases, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital Birmingham, UK</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Guibert</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">J.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Service de Microbiologie Medicale, Hospital Saint-Joseph Paris, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Oxford University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">37(1996-05), 135-144</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0305-7453</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">37&lt;135</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1996</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">37</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">jac</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">CC BY-NC-4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-oxford</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
