<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">445302666</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180317142602.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170323e20100801xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1134/S0001433810040109</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1134/S0001433810040109</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Polnikov</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">V.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pyzhevskii per. 3, 109017, Moscow, Russia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="3">
   <subfield code="a">An extended verification technique for solving problems of numerical modeling of wind waves</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[V. Polnikov]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Based on different modifications of the source function in the WAM(C4) wind-wave model, a large series of verification calculations aimed at increasing the quality of the numerical model (with respect to the parameters of accuracy and performance) is performed. We propose a methodology allowing us to solve the following fundamental and practical problems of numerical modeling: (1) determining the minimum interval of verification of numerical wind-wave models, (2) finding a criterion for choosing the best model out of all models subjected to verification, and (3) formulating the accuracy requirement for specifying the input field necessary for the given accuracy of wind-wave field calculations. Particularly, we have found that (a) the minimum term of verification calculations for numerical wind-wave models is three months; (b) according to our criterion, the proposed modification of the WAM model impartially is &quot;essentially preferable” to the original model; and (c) the relative errors (yielded by the proposed version of the WAM model) in the calculated wave heights ρH s and average periods ρT m for different levels of the relative error of the input wind-wave field ρW make it possible to solve the third problem mentioned above.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2010</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">wind waves</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">wave spectra</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">numerical modeling</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">forecast</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">verification</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">SP MAIK Nauka/Interperiodica</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">46/4(2010-08-01), 511-523</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0001-4338</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">46:4&lt;511</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2010</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">46</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11485</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433810040109</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433810040109</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Polnikov</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">V.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pyzhevskii per. 3, 109017, Moscow, Russia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">SP MAIK Nauka/Interperiodica</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">46/4(2010-08-01), 511-523</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0001-4338</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">46:4&lt;511</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2010</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">46</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11485</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
