<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">445304162</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180317142607.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170323e20100301xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s13246-010-0004-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s13246-010-0004-x</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) surface dose measurements using a PTW advanced Markus chamber</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[F. Chen, R. Gupta, P. Metcalfe]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">A new PTW advanced Markus ionization chamber has been implemented in IMRT fields, to measure surface dose at ICRU and ICRP reference depth of 0.07mm [ICRU Report 39, Determination of dose equivalents resulting from external radiation sources, 1985; ICRP Publication 60, 1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, 1991]. This chamber has a small radius with a revised guard ring design, therefore less prone to surface over-response effects. The over response correction for advanced Markus chamber is 3.3%, which is significantly smaller than 10.1% which was the original Markus chamber over response. After over response correction, the surface dose can be accurately measured by either data extrapolation or by adding one layer of plastic sheet protector to the top of Markus chamber. The surface dose measurements for small fields, e.g 3×3cm, the polarity effect of advanced Markus chamber is 12%, which is significantly higher than the 5% polarity effect of the original Markus. For a 12×12cm field size, surface dose (at 0.07mm) measured by advanced Markus chamber is 19.8% for open field and 19.2% for an unmodulated step-and-shoot IMRT field. The variation in surface dose due to intensity modulated IMRT fields has also been investigated. For an intensity modulated, step-wedge IMRT field, surface dose varies from 15.7±1% for the highest intensity segment to 26.9±1% for the lowest intensity segment. The results of chamber measurements have been compared against EBT type GAFCHROMIC® film results.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine, 2010</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Surface dose</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">IMRT</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Markus chamber</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Gafchromic film</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Chen</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">F.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Radiation Oncology Medical Physics, Westmead Cancer Care Center, 2145, Westmead, NSW, Australia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Gupta</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">R.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Medical Physics, St George Cancer Care Center, Kogarah, NSW, Australia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Metcalfe</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">P.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Center for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Australasian Physical &amp; Engineering Sciences in Medicine</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">33/1(2010-03-01), 23-34</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0158-9938</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">33:1&lt;23</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2010</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">33</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">13246</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-010-0004-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-010-0004-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Chen</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">F.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Radiation Oncology Medical Physics, Westmead Cancer Care Center, 2145, Westmead, NSW, Australia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Gupta</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">R.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Medical Physics, St George Cancer Care Center, Kogarah, NSW, Australia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Metcalfe</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">P.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Center for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Australasian Physical &amp; Engineering Sciences in Medicine</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">33/1(2010-03-01), 23-34</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0158-9938</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">33:1&lt;23</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2010</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">33</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">13246</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
