<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">445304278</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180317142607.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170323e20101201xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s13246-010-0035-3</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s13246-010-0035-3</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Optimal beam quality selection based on contrast-to-noise ratio and mean glandular dose in digital mammography</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[M. Aminah, K. Ng, B. Abdullah, N. Jamal]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">The performance of a digital mammography system (Siemens Mammomat Novation) using different target/filter combinations and tube voltage has been assessed. The objective of this study is to optimize beam quality selection based on contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and mean glandular dose (MGD). Three composition of breast were studied with composition of glandular/adipose of 30/70, 50/50, and 70/30. CNR was measured using 2, 4 and 6cm-thick simulated breast phantoms with an aluminium sheet of 0.1mm thickness placed on top of the phantom. Three target/filter combinations, namely molybdenum/molybdenum (Mo/Mo), molybdenum/rhodium (Mo/Rh) and tungsten/rhodium (W/Rh) with various tube voltage and mAs were tested. MGD was measured for each exposure. For 50/50 breast composition, Mo/Rh combination with tube voltage 26kVp is optimal for 2cm-thick breast. W/Rh combination with tube voltage 27 and 28 kVp are optimal for 4 and 6cm-thick breast, respectively. For both 30/70 and 70/30 breast composition, W/Rh combination is optimal with tube voltage 25, 26 and 27kVp, respectively. From our study it was shown that there are potential of dose reduction up to 11% for a set CNR of 3.0 by using beam quality other than that are determined by AEC selection. Under the constraint of lowest MGD, for a particular breast composition, calcification detection is optimized by using a softer X-ray beam for thin breast and harder X-ray beam for thick breast. These experimental results also indicate that for breast with high fibroglandular tissues (70/30), the use of higher beam quality does not always increase calcification detection due to additional structured noise caused by the fibroglandular tissues itself.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine, 2010</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Digital mammography</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Optimization</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Mean glandular dose</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Contrast-to-noise ratio</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Aminah</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">M.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Biomedical Imaging, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Ng</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">K.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Biomedical Imaging, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Abdullah</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">B.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Biomedical Imaging, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Jamal</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">N.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Medical Technology Division, Malaysian Nuclear Agency, Kajang, Malaysia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Australasian Physical &amp; Engineering Sciences in Medicine</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">33/4(2010-12-01), 329-334</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0158-9938</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">33:4&lt;329</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2010</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">33</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">13246</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-010-0035-3</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">brief-communication</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-010-0035-3</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Aminah</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">M.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Biomedical Imaging, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Ng</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">K.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Biomedical Imaging, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Abdullah</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">B.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Biomedical Imaging, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Jamal</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">N.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Medical Technology Division, Malaysian Nuclear Agency, Kajang, Malaysia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Australasian Physical &amp; Engineering Sciences in Medicine</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">33/4(2010-12-01), 329-334</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0158-9938</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">33:4&lt;329</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2010</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">33</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">13246</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
