<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">445307285</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180317142617.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170323e20110301xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s00404-010-1390-8</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00404-010-1390-8</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="2">
   <subfield code="a">A new algorithm for improving fetal weight estimation from ultrasound data at term</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[W. Siggelkow, M. Schmidt, C. Skala, D. Boehm, S. von Forstner, H. Koelbl, A. Tresch]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Objective: The purpose of this retrospective study was to find a method of improving the accuracy of fetal birth weight estimation on the basis of traditional ultrasonographic measurements of the head, thorax, and femur at term. In this context, we analyzed a novel regression method comparing to existing algorithms. Methods: The delivery records of two hospitals were searched for women who delivered macrosomic infants, and the patients' medical records were retrospectively reviewed in order to derive clinical and ultrasonographic data at term. A total of 223 patients with macrosomic infants (birth weight&gt;4,000g) were identified. These patients were complemented by data for 212 women who had ultrasound fetal assessments of less than 4,000g. We used the method of isotonic regression to construct a birth weight prediction function that increases monotonically with each of the input variables and which minimizes the empirical quadratic loss. Results: A suspicion of macrosomia was based on a history of macrosomia, fundal height, and sonographic weight estimation &gt;4,000g. The mean period between ultrasound weight estimation and delivery was 7.2days. The ability of the biometric algorithms developed to predict fetal weight at term ranged between a mean absolute error of 312 and 344g, given a confidence interval of 95%. We demonstrate that predictions of birth weight on the basis of ultrasound data can be improved significantly, if an isotonic regression model is used instead of a linear regression model. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that ultrasound detection of macrosomia can be improved using the isotonic regression method.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">The Author(s), 2010</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Fetal weight estimation</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Fetal macrosomia</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Birth weight algorithms</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Isotonic regression</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Siggelkow</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">W.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Schmidt</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">M.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Skala</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">C.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Boehm</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">D.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">von Forstner</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">S.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Koelbl</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">H.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Tresch</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">A.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Gene Center, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, LMU, Muenchen, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">283/3(2011-03-01), 469-474</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0932-0067</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">283:3&lt;469</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">283</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">404</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1390-8</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1390-8</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Siggelkow</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">W.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Schmidt</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">M.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Skala</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">C.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Boehm</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">D.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">von Forstner</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">S.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Koelbl</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">H.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Tresch</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">A.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Gene Center, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, LMU, Muenchen, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">283/3(2011-03-01), 469-474</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0932-0067</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">283:3&lt;469</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">283</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">404</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
