<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">445308540</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180317142621.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170323e20110501xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s00404-011-1858-1</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00404-011-1858-1</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Tubal anastomosis after tubal sterilization: a review</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Xavier Deffieux, Michèle Morin Surroca, Erika Faivre, Frédérique Pages, Hervé Fernandez, Amélie Gervaise]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Purpose: To evaluate various techniques for restoring tubal patency after sterilisation. Methods: A search strategy was designed, and for each subject either thesaurus terms (MeSH descriptors) or terms from the title or summary were used. Results: Mean length of hospital stay following laparoscopy seems to be shorter in comparison with laparotomy (3.3 vs. 6.1days, P&lt;0.05). Rate of conversion to laparotomy is 5%. Pregnancy rates observed are between 54 and 88% for laparotomy and 31-85% for laparoscopy. Mean time to conception was between 2 and 9.6months. Most pregnancies occurred in the 2years following restoration of tubal patency (cumulative conception rate 80% at 12months). Young age (&lt;35years), type of ligature (rings), how recently the ligature was done (&lt;8years), the anastomosis site (in the middle of the tube) and a good length of remaining tube (&gt;7cm) are the factors that govern whether there can be good restoration of tubal patency. Ectopic pregnancy rates observed are between 1.7 and 12% for laparotomy and 0-7% for laparoscopy. There are no randomised or quasi-randomised studies comparing tubal anastomosis and in vitro fertilization. Conclusions: There are few good-quality controlled studies in this area. Results of restoration of tubal patency seem to be comparable, regardless of the route of approach (laparotomy or laparoscopy).</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag, 2011</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Tubotubal anastomosis</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Tuboplasty</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Salpingostomy</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Salpingolysis</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Tubal implantation into uterus</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Microsurgical tuboplasty</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Tubal anastomosis</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Systematic review</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Deffieux</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Xavier</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, F-94274, Paris, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Morin Surroca</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Michèle</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Service évaluation des actes professionnels, Professional Procedures Evaluation Department, Haute Autorité de la Santé, Paris, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Faivre</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Erika</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">AP-HP, Service De Gynécologie-Obstétrique et Médecine de la Reproduction, Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine Department, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, 157 rue de la Porte de Trivaux, F-92140, Clamart, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Pages</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Frédérique</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Service évaluation des actes professionnels, Professional Procedures Evaluation Department, Haute Autorité de la Santé, Paris, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Fernandez</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Hervé</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, F-94274, Paris, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Gervaise</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Amélie</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">AP-HP, Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, CHU Bicêtre, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, F-94275, Paris, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">283/5(2011-05-01), 1149-1158</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0932-0067</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">283:5&lt;1149</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">283</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">404</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-1858-1</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">review-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-1858-1</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Deffieux</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Xavier</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, F-94274, Paris, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Morin Surroca</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Michèle</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Service évaluation des actes professionnels, Professional Procedures Evaluation Department, Haute Autorité de la Santé, Paris, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Faivre</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Erika</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">AP-HP, Service De Gynécologie-Obstétrique et Médecine de la Reproduction, Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine Department, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, 157 rue de la Porte de Trivaux, F-92140, Clamart, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Pages</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Frédérique</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Service évaluation des actes professionnels, Professional Procedures Evaluation Department, Haute Autorité de la Santé, Paris, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Fernandez</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Hervé</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, F-94274, Paris, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Gervaise</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Amélie</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">AP-HP, Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, CHU Bicêtre, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, F-94275, Paris, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">283/5(2011-05-01), 1149-1158</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0932-0067</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">283:5&lt;1149</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">283</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">404</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
