<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">445309512</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180317142624.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170323e20111201xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s00404-011-1862-5</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00404-011-1862-5</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Ogunlesi</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Tinuade</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Olabisi Onabanjo University Teaching Hospital, P. O. Box 652, 121001, Sagamu, Ogun State, Nigeria</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Factors influencing the survival of newborn babies weighing &lt;1.5kg in Sagamu, Nigeria</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Tinuade Ogunlesi]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Background: Identification of the causes of death among low birth weight babies may facilitate interventions required to improve their survival. Objective: To determine the epidemiological factors associated with the survival of very low- and extremely low birth weight babies. Methods: Consecutive low birth weight babies aged &lt;168h in a Nigerian tertiary hospital were studied between January and December 2008 using bivariate and multivariate methods. Results: Out of 160 babies weighing &lt;2.5kg admitted, 78 (48.8%) weighed 0.65-1.49kg. Survival rates were 6.7% for &lt;1kg, 57.4% for 1-1.49kg and 84.9% for 1.5-2.49kg. Overall, survival rate was 84.9% for babies weighing ≥1.5kg (84.9%) compared to 46.4% among babies weighing &lt;1.5kg (P&lt;0.0001). Survival among babies who weighed &lt;1.5kg was associated with EGA≥32weeks and caesarean delivery while death was associated with the occurrence of asphyxia, apnea and respiratory distress. EGA≥32weeks (OR=1.7), absence of respiratory distress (OR=2.1) and absence of apnea (OR=5.3) were independent determinants of survival. Conclusion: Survival rate of babies weighing &lt;1.5kg remains high in this population. The poor state of diagnostic and therapeutic facilities in the centre may be contributory.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag, 2011</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Apnea</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Asphyxia</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Prematurity</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Survival rate</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Very low birth weight</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">284/6(2011-12-01), 1351-1357</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0932-0067</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">284:6&lt;1351</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">284</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">404</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-1862-5</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-1862-5</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Ogunlesi</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Tinuade</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Olabisi Onabanjo University Teaching Hospital, P. O. Box 652, 121001, Sagamu, Ogun State, Nigeria</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">284/6(2011-12-01), 1351-1357</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0932-0067</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">284:6&lt;1351</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">284</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">404</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
