<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">445310006</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180317142626.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170323e20110901xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s00404-010-1715-7</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00404-010-1715-7</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Does local injection with lidocaine plus epinephrine prior to vaginal reconstructive surgery with synthetic mesh affect exposure rates? A retrospective comparison</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Peter Finamore, Krystal Hunter, Howard Goldstein, Babak Vakili, Adam Holzberg]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Does local injection with lidocaine plus epinephrine prior to vaginal reconstructive surgery with synthetic mesh affect exposure rates? A retrospective comparison. Purpose: To determine if local injection, prior to incision with lidocaine plus epinephrine (L+E) influences the rate of mesh exposure in the early postoperative period following synthetic mesh augmented vaginal reconstructive surgery (MAVR). Methods: We performed a chart review over an 18-month period of patients who underwent MAVR. The presence of mesh exposure at the 3-month postoperative visit, demographic data and whether or not L+E was used to hydrodissect was recorded. Statistical analysis was performed to determine whether hydrodissection influenced erosion rates. Results: A total of 143 meshes were placed, hydrodissection with L+E was used in 78 cases and was not in the remaining 65 cases. There were 10 (7.0% 10/143) total erosions at the 3-month postoperative visit, 6 (7.7%; 6/78) in the group that got L+E and 4 (6.2%; 4/65) in the group that did not get local injection. This difference was not significant (p=0.740, OR 1.54 95% CI 0.41-5.76). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of age, presence of diabetes, concurrent incontinence repair or estimated blood loss. Conclusion: Mesh exposure is a known complication of MAVR. Our study suggests that local injection with L+E prior to vaginal surgery does not influence exposure rates.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag, 2010</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Mesh augmented vaginal reconstruction</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Mesh exposure</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Hydrodissection</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Finamore</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Peter</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Division of Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology, Winthrop University Hospital, 259 First Street, 11501, Mineola, NY, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Hunter</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Krystal</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Biostatistics Group, Cooper University Hospital UMDNJ-RWJMS, Camden, NJ, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Goldstein</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Howard</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Christiana Health Care System, Center for Urogynecology and Pelvic Surgery, Newark, DE, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Vakili</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Babak</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Christiana Health Care System, Center for Urogynecology and Pelvic Surgery, Newark, DE, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Holzberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Adam</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">284/3(2011-09-01), 659-662</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0932-0067</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">284:3&lt;659</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">284</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">404</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1715-7</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1715-7</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Finamore</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Peter</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Division of Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology, Winthrop University Hospital, 259 First Street, 11501, Mineola, NY, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Hunter</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Krystal</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Biostatistics Group, Cooper University Hospital UMDNJ-RWJMS, Camden, NJ, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Goldstein</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Howard</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Christiana Health Care System, Center for Urogynecology and Pelvic Surgery, Newark, DE, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Vakili</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Babak</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Christiana Health Care System, Center for Urogynecology and Pelvic Surgery, Newark, DE, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Holzberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Adam</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">284/3(2011-09-01), 659-662</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0932-0067</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">284:3&lt;659</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">284</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">404</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
