<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">44531009X</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180317142626.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170323e20110901xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s00404-010-1712-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00404-010-1712-x</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Pilot study into the efficacy of foetal fibronectin testing in minimising hospital admissions in women presenting with symptoms of preterm labour: a randomised controlled trial of obstetric and neonatal outcomes</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Debarati Dutta, Jane Norman]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Aims: The purpose of this pilot study was to determine the role of foetal fibronectin (fFN) testing in women presenting to hospital with symptoms of preterm labour in reducing the hospital admissions, without significantly increasing the risk of preterm birth and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Methods: Women with symptoms of preterm labour were assigned randomly to receive fFN (n=44) or to preterm labour management without fFN (n=44). In the testing arm, the result of the test was revealed to the clinician. Clinical outcomes were compared in the two groups. The time period covered by the randomised controlled trial (RCT) was from December 2007 to March 2009. The RCT was conducted in two large maternity units in the west of Scotland, one in Glasgow the other in Ayrshire. Results: All the women with fibronectin positive got admitted while only 32.4% of the fibronectin negatives were admitted (P=0.002). There was a significant difference in the mean length of stay between the fibronectin positives which was 47.17h, and the negatives which was 12.9h (P=0.018). Overall the control and testing arms did not differ in respect to admissions and length of stay. 5 out of 7 positives and 11 out of 37 negatives had corticosteroids (P=0.089). 2 out of 7 positives and 1 out of 37 negatives had tocolytics (P=0.073). Conclusions: Those who had the fFN test done were less likely to be admitted in the hospital and had a shorter length of stay, without any increase in the adverse maternal or foetal effects, avoiding unnecessary admissions.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag, 2010</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Foetal fibronectin</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Preterm labour</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Hospital admissions</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Length of stay</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Neonatal outcomes</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Dutta</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Debarati</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Crosshouse Hospital, Kilmarnock, 50, Springhill Avenue, Crosshouse, KA2 0JP, Kilmarnock, UK</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Norman</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Jane</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Centre for Reproductive Biology, The Queens Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, 47, Little France Crescent, EH16 4TJ, Edinburgh, UK</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">284/3(2011-09-01), 559-565</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0932-0067</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">284:3&lt;559</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">284</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">404</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1712-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1712-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Dutta</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Debarati</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Crosshouse Hospital, Kilmarnock, 50, Springhill Avenue, Crosshouse, KA2 0JP, Kilmarnock, UK</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Norman</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Jane</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Centre for Reproductive Biology, The Queens Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, 47, Little France Crescent, EH16 4TJ, Edinburgh, UK</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">284/3(2011-09-01), 559-565</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0932-0067</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">284:3&lt;559</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">284</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">404</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
