<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">445310928</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180317142629.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170323e20111101xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s00404-010-1797-2</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00404-010-1797-2</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Macrosomia prediction using different maternal and fetal parameters in women with 50g glucose challenge test between 130 and 140mg/dl</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Ebru Tarim, Tayfun Cok]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Objective: Our aim in this study was to investigate the association between 1-h glucose challenge test (GCT) of 130-140mg/dl and the development of macrosomia. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, patients with GCT between 130 and 140mg/dl were divided into two groups. Macrosomic and appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) term neonates were compared for the presence of maternal risk factors and fetal abdominal circumference between 29 and 34weeks. Results: There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to maternal age, parity, BMI at the first trimester and at the time of GCT, gestational weeks at delivery. However; history of a macrosomic baby delivery was significantly higher in macrosomic group (33.3% for group 1, 11.3% for group 2, p=0.001). Abdominal circumference at 29-34weeks of gestations was significantly higher in macrosomic group (32.46±1.97 for group 1 vs. 31.06±2.46 for group 2, p=0.002). Conclusion: History of a macrosomic baby delivery and abdominal measurement at 29-34weeks was important predictors of macrosomia in patients with GCT between 130 and 140mg/dl.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag, 2010</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">50g glucose challenge test</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Macrosomia</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Risk factors</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">GDM</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Tarim</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Ebru</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Cok</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Tayfun</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">284/5(2011-11-01), 1081-1085</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0932-0067</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">284:5&lt;1081</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">284</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">404</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1797-2</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1797-2</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Tarim</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Ebru</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Cok</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Tayfun</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">284/5(2011-11-01), 1081-1085</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0932-0067</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">284:5&lt;1081</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">284</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">404</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
