<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">445313714</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180317142639.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170323e20110801xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s11095-011-0422-9</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s11095-011-0422-9</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="2">
   <subfield code="a">A New Exact Test for the Evaluation of Population Pharmacokinetic and/or Pharmacodynamic Models Using Random Projections</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Celine Laffont, Didier Concordet]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">ABSTRACT: Purpose: Within-subject dependency of observations has a strong impact on the evaluation of population pharmacokinetic (PK) and/or pharmacodynamic (PD) models. To our knowledge, none of the current model evaluation tools correctly address this issue. We present a new method with a global test and easy diagnostic plot which relies on the use of a random projection technique that allows the analysis of dependent data. Methods: For each subject, the vector of standardised residuals is calculated and projected onto many random directions drawn uniformly from the unit sphere. Our test compares the empirical distribution of projections with their distribution under the model. Simulation studies assess the level of the test and compare its performance with common metrics including normalised prediction distribution errors and different types of weighted residuals. An application to real data is performed. Results: In contrast to other evaluated methods, our test shows adequate level for all models and designs investigated, which confirms its good theoretical properties. The weakness of other methods is demonstrated and discussed. Conclusions: This new test appears promising and could be used in combination with other tools to drive model evaluation in population PK/PD analyses.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2011</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">GUD</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">model evaluation or diagnostics</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">nonlinear mixed effects models</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">normalised prediction distribution errors NPDE</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">weighted residuals</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">KS : Kolmogorov-Smirnov</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">VPC : visual predictive check</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">GUD : global uniform distance</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Laffont</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Celine</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">INRA, UMR 1331, Toxalim, F-31027, Toulouse, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Concordet</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Didier</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">INRA, UMR 1331, Toxalim, F-31027, Toulouse, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Pharmaceutical Research</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">28/8(2011-08-01), 1948-1962</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0724-8741</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">28:8&lt;1948</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">28</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11095</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-011-0422-9</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-011-0422-9</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Laffont</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Celine</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">INRA, UMR 1331, Toxalim, F-31027, Toulouse, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Concordet</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Didier</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">INRA, UMR 1331, Toxalim, F-31027, Toulouse, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Pharmaceutical Research</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">28/8(2011-08-01), 1948-1962</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0724-8741</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">28:8&lt;1948</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">28</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11095</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
