<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">445322853</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180317142710.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170323e20111101xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10681-011-0487-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10681-011-0487-x</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Inheritance of sugar and acid contents in the ripe berries of a tetraploid×diploid grape cross population</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Zhenchang Liang, Min Sang, Aihong Ma, Shengjian Zhao, Gan-yuan Zhong, Shaohua Li]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Inheritance patterns of sugar and organic acid contents of ripe berries in a tetraploid×diploid table grape cross population were investigated in two successive years. The population segregated for three different ploid levels: dipolids, triploids, and tetraploids. Sugar content in tetraploid progeny was significantly higher than that in the diploid progeny. Transgressive segregation for sugar content was observed in all the three ploid levels in the progeny population. The broad sense heritabilities (H2) of glucose, fructose and total sugar contents ranged from 0.68 to 0.79. The tetraploid progeny had the highest H2, followed by the diploid and triploid progeny. The sugar contents appeared additive as the ploid level increased. All the sugar contents were highly and positively correlated with each other. Malic acid in the diploid progeny population was significantly higher than that in the polyploid progeny populations, and the tartaric acid in the triploid progeny was significantly higher than that in diploid and tetraploid progenies. H2 of organic acids ranged from 0.71 to 0.91, with the tetraploids having the highest mean H2. In contrast with the sugar content, the total acid content was decreased as the ploid level increased. Positive correlations were also observed among the contents of various acids, but the correlation coefficient was low between tartaric acid and malic acid and moderate between tartaric acid and the total acids. A large range of variation was observed for both sugars and acids in the triploid and tetraploid progenies than in the diploid progeny.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2011</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Sugar</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Organic acid</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Inheritance</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Polyploidy</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Liang</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Zhenchang</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Beijing Key Laboratory of Grape Science and Wine Technology, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100093, Beijing, People's Republic of China</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Sang</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Min</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institute of Hydrobiology, Jinan University, 510632, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Ma</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Aihong</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institute of Fruits of Changli, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry, 066600, Hebei, People's Republic of China</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Zhao</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Shengjian</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institute of Fruits of Changli, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry, 066600, Hebei, People's Republic of China</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Zhong</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Gan-yuan</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">USDA-ARS Grape Genetics Research Unit, 14456, Geneva, NY, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Li</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Shaohua</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Key Laboratory of Plant Germplasm Enhancement and Speciality Agriculture, Wuhan Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, 430074, Wuhan, People's Republic of China</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Euphytica</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">182/2(2011-11-01), 251-259</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0014-2336</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">182:2&lt;251</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">182</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10681</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-011-0487-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-011-0487-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Liang</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Zhenchang</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Beijing Key Laboratory of Grape Science and Wine Technology, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100093, Beijing, People's Republic of China</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Sang</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Min</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institute of Hydrobiology, Jinan University, 510632, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Ma</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Aihong</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institute of Fruits of Changli, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry, 066600, Hebei, People's Republic of China</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Zhao</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Shengjian</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institute of Fruits of Changli, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry, 066600, Hebei, People's Republic of China</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Zhong</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Gan-yuan</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">USDA-ARS Grape Genetics Research Unit, 14456, Geneva, NY, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Li</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Shaohua</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Key Laboratory of Plant Germplasm Enhancement and Speciality Agriculture, Wuhan Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, 430074, Wuhan, People's Republic of China</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Euphytica</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">182/2(2011-11-01), 251-259</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0014-2336</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">182:2&lt;251</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">182</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10681</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
