<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">445332786</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180317142742.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170323e20110101xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1245/s10434-010-1211-0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1245/s10434-010-1211-0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Surgical Management Modifications Following Systematic Additional Shaving of Cavity Margins in Breast-Conservation Treatment</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Delphine Héquet, Alexandre Bricou, Yann Delpech, Emmanuel Barranger]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Background: Positive wide local excision margins are the most important risk factor of local breast-carcinoma recurrence. Shaving additional margins could lower the need for re-excisions when wide local excision margins are positive and cavity margins are negative. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study, from January 2007 to December 2008, included 99 women with breast carcinomas who underwent wide local excision with 4 additional, systematically shaved, surgical cavity margins. All therapeutic decisions concerning post-wide local excision treatment were made by consensus during multidisciplinary meetings. Results: This systematic cavity-shaving strategy avoided 25 re-excisions (25.3%), and 6 patients required new surgery because of carcinoma found in the additional cavity-shaving margins, despite negative wide local excision margins. No preoperative factor predictive of positive cavity margins was identified. Conclusions: Systematic shaving of additional cavity margins changed the surgical management after breast-conservation treatment.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Society of Surgical Oncology, 2010</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Héquet</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Delphine</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Lariboisière Hospital, Assitance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Bricou</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Alexandre</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Lariboisière Hospital, Assitance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Delpech</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Yann</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Lariboisière Hospital, Assitance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Barranger</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Emmanuel</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Lariboisière Hospital, Assitance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Annals of Surgical Oncology</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">18/1(2011-01-01), 114-118</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1068-9265</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">18:1&lt;114</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">18</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10434</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1211-0</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1211-0</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Héquet</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Delphine</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Lariboisière Hospital, Assitance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Bricou</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Alexandre</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Lariboisière Hospital, Assitance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Delpech</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Yann</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Lariboisière Hospital, Assitance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Barranger</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Emmanuel</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Lariboisière Hospital, Assitance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Annals of Surgical Oncology</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">18/1(2011-01-01), 114-118</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1068-9265</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">18:1&lt;114</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">18</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10434</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
