<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">445334088</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180317142747.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170323e20110701xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1245/s10434-010-1443-z</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1245/s10434-010-1443-z</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Functional Outcome of Arthrodesis with a Vascularized Fibular Graft and a Rotational Latissimus Dorsi Flap After Proximal Humerus Sarcoma Resection</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Jin Wang, Jingnan Shen, Ian Dickinson]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Background: The prognosis of humeral sarcomas has improved greatly in the past 20years. As a result, the challenges for orthopedic oncologists include long-term handicap and local morbidity. Methods: Shoulder reconstruction after the resection of sarcomas with the proximal humerus was evaluated for 55 patients from 1990 to 2007 at two universities. After S34(5)B resections (intra-articular resection of the proximal humerus and the abductor mechanism), the shoulders were reconstructed with arthrodesis, prosthesis, or allograft-prosthesis composites (APC). Results: At the time of the latest follow-up examination, the average duration of follow-up was 86.73months for the 39 patients who were still alive and whose limbs were salvaged. The local recurrence rate was 7.27% (4 of 55). Functional evaluation was conducted on the 39 patients who had the postreconstructions: 12 arthrodeses, 17 prostheses, and 10 APC. Statistical analysis showed that the functional score of shoulder reconstruction significantly varied among the three groups by the test of homogeneity of variances with P=0.222, by analysis of variance with P&lt;0.01, and by post hoc test (Student-Newman-Keuls) with α=0.05. Primary arthrodesis resulted in better function and increased strength than the prostheses and the APC. Insertion of an allograft, a vascularized fibular graft, a rotational latissimus dorsi flap, and cancellous autograft bone were the preferred arthrodesis techniques used to achieve fusion and reduce complications. Conclusions: After resection of the sarcoma with the proximal humerus with the abductor apparatus, shoulder arthrodesis is recommended above other reconstructions for better functional outcome as well as increased strength and capacity to position the hand.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Society of Surgical Oncology, 2011</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Wang</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Jin</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Muskulaskeletal Oncology Department, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhongshan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Shen</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Jingnan</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Muskulaskeletal Oncology Department, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhongshan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Dickinson</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Ian</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">The Wesley Hospital, The Princess Alexandra Hospital, Wesley Medical Centre, Auchenflower, Australia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Annals of Surgical Oncology</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">18/7(2011-07-01), 1852-1859</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1068-9265</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">18:7&lt;1852</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">18</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10434</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1443-z</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1443-z</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Wang</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Jin</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Muskulaskeletal Oncology Department, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhongshan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Shen</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Jingnan</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Muskulaskeletal Oncology Department, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhongshan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Dickinson</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Ian</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">The Wesley Hospital, The Princess Alexandra Hospital, Wesley Medical Centre, Auchenflower, Australia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Annals of Surgical Oncology</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">18/7(2011-07-01), 1852-1859</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1068-9265</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">18:7&lt;1852</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">18</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10434</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
