<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">44535495X</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180317142857.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170323e20111101xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s00446-011-0142-8</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00446-011-0142-8</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">On set consensus numbers</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Eli Gafni, Petr Kuznetsov]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">It is conjectured that the only way a failure detector (FD) can help solving n-process tasks is by providing k-set consensus for some $${k\in\{1,\ldots,n\}}$$ among all the processes. It was recently shown by Zieliński that any FD that allows for solving a given n-process task that is unsolvable read-write wait-free, also solves (n − 1)-set consensus. In this paper, we provide a generalization of Zieliński's result. We show that any FD that solves a colorless task that cannot be solved read-write k-resiliently, also solves k-set consensus. More generally, we show that every colorless task $${\mathcal{T}}$$ can be characterized by its set consensus number: the largest $${k\in\{1,\ldots,n\}}$$ such that $${\mathcal{T}}$$ is solvable (k − 1)-resiliently. A task $${\mathcal{T}}$$ with set consensus number k is, in the failure detector sense, equivalent to k-set consensus, i.e., a FD solves $${\mathcal{T}}$$ if and only if it solves k-set consensus. As a corollary, we determine the weakest FD for solving k-set consensus in every environment, i.e., for all assumptions on when and where failures might occur.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag, 2011</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Gafni</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Eli</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Computer Science Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Kuznetsov</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Petr</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">TU Berlin/Deutsche Telekom Laboratories, Berlin, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Distributed Computing</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">24/3-4(2011-11-01), 149-163</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0178-2770</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">24:3-4&lt;149</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">24</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">446</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00446-011-0142-8</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00446-011-0142-8</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Gafni</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Eli</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Computer Science Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Kuznetsov</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Petr</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">TU Berlin/Deutsche Telekom Laboratories, Berlin, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Distributed Computing</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">24/3-4(2011-11-01), 149-163</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0178-2770</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">24:3-4&lt;149</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">24</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">446</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
