<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">445363266</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180317142921.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170323e20111201xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s00780-010-0140-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00780-010-0140-x</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Optimal investment with counterparty risk: adefault-density model approach</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Ying Jiao, Huyên Pham]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">We consider a financial market with a stock exposed to a counterparty risk inducing a jump in the price, and which can still be traded after this default time. The jump represents a loss or gain of the asset value at the default of the counterparty. We use a default-density modelling approach, and address in this incomplete market context the problem of expected utility maximization from terminal wealth. We show how this problem can be suitably decomposed in two optimization problems in a default-free framework: an after-default utility maximization and a global before-default optimization problem involving the former one. These two optimization problems are solved explicitly, respectively, by duality and dynamic programming approaches, and provide a detailed description of the optimal strategy. We give some numerical results illustrating the impact of counterparty risk and the loss or gain given default on optimal trading strategies, in particular with respect to the Merton portfolio selection problem. For example, this explains how an investor can take advantage of a large loss of the asset value at default in extreme situations as observed during the financial crisis.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag, 2010</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Counterparty risk</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Contagious loss or gain</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Density of default time</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Optimal investment</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Duality</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Dynamic programming</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Backward stochastic differential equation (BSDE)</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Jiao</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Ying</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Laboratoire de Probabilités et Modèles Aléatoires, CNRS, UMR 7599, Université Paris 7, Paris, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Pham</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Huyên</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Laboratoire de Probabilités et Modèles Aléatoires, CNRS, UMR 7599, Université Paris 7, Paris, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Finance and Stochastics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">15/4(2011-12-01), 725-753</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0949-2984</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">15:4&lt;725</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">15</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">780</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00780-010-0140-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00780-010-0140-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Jiao</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Ying</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Laboratoire de Probabilités et Modèles Aléatoires, CNRS, UMR 7599, Université Paris 7, Paris, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Pham</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Huyên</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Laboratoire de Probabilités et Modèles Aléatoires, CNRS, UMR 7599, Université Paris 7, Paris, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Finance and Stochastics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">15/4(2011-12-01), 725-753</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0949-2984</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">15:4&lt;725</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">15</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">780</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
