<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">445363819</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180317142923.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170323e20110901xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10397-010-0652-6</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10397-010-0652-6</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">FDG-PET value in deep endometriosis</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[A. Setubal, S. Maia, C. Lowenthal, Z. Sidiropoulou]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Although laparoscopy continues to be the gold standard in the diagnosis of deep endometriosis, non-invasive imaging methods are important for an adequate staging of the disease, as they may determine the site, size, and severity of the lesions and thus contribute to planning the surgical treatment better. An observational study was carried out between April 2008 and June 2009 during which time nine consecutive patients underwent preoperative PET scan examination for clinical suspicion of deep endometriosis. PET scans provide a functional assessment of cellular activity; but in our study, it did not exhibit consistent results.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag, 2010</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Deep endomertiosis</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">FDG-PET scan</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Laparoscopy</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Diagnostic immaging</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Setubal</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">A.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Gynecology Department, Hospital da Luz, Av. Lusiada 100, 1500-650, Lisbon, Portugal</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Maia</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">S.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Gynecology Department, Hospital da Luz, Av. Lusiada 100, 1500-650, Lisbon, Portugal</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Lowenthal</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">C.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Gynecology Department, Hospital da Luz, Av. Lusiada 100, 1500-650, Lisbon, Portugal</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Sidiropoulou</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Z.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Gynecology Department, Hospital da Luz, Av. Lusiada 100, 1500-650, Lisbon, Portugal</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Gynecological Surgery</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">8/3(2011-09-01), 305-309</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1613-2076</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">8:3&lt;305</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">8</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10397</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-010-0652-6</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-010-0652-6</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Setubal</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">A.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Gynecology Department, Hospital da Luz, Av. Lusiada 100, 1500-650, Lisbon, Portugal</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Maia</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">S.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Gynecology Department, Hospital da Luz, Av. Lusiada 100, 1500-650, Lisbon, Portugal</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Lowenthal</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">C.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Gynecology Department, Hospital da Luz, Av. Lusiada 100, 1500-650, Lisbon, Portugal</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Sidiropoulou</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Z.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Gynecology Department, Hospital da Luz, Av. Lusiada 100, 1500-650, Lisbon, Portugal</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Gynecological Surgery</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">8/3(2011-09-01), 305-309</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1613-2076</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">8:3&lt;305</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">8</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10397</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
