<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">445801972</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180317145144.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170323e20110301xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10337-011-1924-7</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10337-011-1924-7</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Tian</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Hongzhe</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Analysis and Testing Center, Shenyang Agricultural University, 120 Dongling Road, 110161, Shenyang, China</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Uncertainty Analysis of Chlormequat Residue in Fruits by LC-MS-MS</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Hongzhe Tian]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">A method for determination of chlormequat (CCC) residue in fruits by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) was developed. Residue of CCC was extracted from samples with methanol-water (v/v, 1:1) containing 1.0% acetic acid, cleaned up by strong cationic exchange (SCX) cartridge, and then determined by LC-MS-MS. The method showed good linearity over the concentration range 0.002-5.0mgkg−1 with correlation coefficient above 0.997. The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) for CCC were 5×10−4 mgkg−1 (S/N=3) and 0.002mgkg−1 (S/N=10), respectively. Recoveries for CCC at three spiked levels (0.025, 0.050, and 0.20mgkg−1) were in the range 80-102%. Estimation of measurement uncertainty was calculated for CCC at the level of 0.025mgkg−1 in fruits. The results demonstrated that the uncertainty of recovery was the main contribution to the combined standard uncertainty. The relative combined standard uncertainties associated with the method ranged from 11 to 13%, depending on the sample matrices.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag, 2011</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Chlormequat</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Measurement uncertainty</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Chromatographia</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">73/5-6(2011-03-01), 457-462</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0009-5893</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">73:5-6&lt;457</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">73</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10337</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-011-1924-7</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-011-1924-7</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Tian</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Hongzhe</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Analysis and Testing Center, Shenyang Agricultural University, 120 Dongling Road, 110161, Shenyang, China</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Chromatographia</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">73/5-6(2011-03-01), 457-462</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0009-5893</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">73:5-6&lt;457</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">73</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10337</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
